pull down to refresh
related posts
0 new comment
534 sats \ 0 replies \ @nullcount 17 Oct 2022
Wishing this miner would start a public pool. I have some hashrate that I wouldn't mind donating to the cause
reply
0 new comment
197 sats \ 0 replies \ @l0k1 17 Oct 2022
These guys think they are the Microsoft of Blockchain. Except nobody uses their garbage and nobody cares that their chain is so easy to attack because nobody uses it. I'm sure at some point there won't be a single court in the world that accepts a filing from them.
reply
0 new comment
168 sats \ 1 reply \ @tomlaies 17 Oct 2022
Lmao, don't they notice the notice how there being a centralized entity that can sue meaning that there is a centralized entity? lol
reply
0 new comment
27 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 17 Oct 2022
Exactly. Imagine the real bitcoin starting a law suit. This whole situation reveals what makes bitcoin unique
reply
0 new comment
129 sats \ 0 replies \ @f321x 17 Oct 2022
Let's write some funny mails 😁
reply
0 new comment
199 sats \ 6 replies \ @sandbeach123old 17 Oct 2022
This is interesting however. IMHO this is just a soft fork, where this miner is enforcing a new "rule" (blocks must be empty). And by the hashing power the miner has, seems this is a successful fork. Minority miners will only mine orphans and therefore will get 0 reward.
What these guys of bsv do not get is that this is how the game works.
reply
0 new comment
80 sats \ 5 replies \ @sommerfeld 17 Oct 2022
It's not a fork, the miner is not breaking any rules, otherwise the other 14 BSV nodes would instantly reject its blocks.
reply
0 new comment
25 sats \ 4 replies \ @sandbeach123old 17 Oct 2022
The soft fork does not break existing rules, but adds a new one, so it restricts even more the consensus. It is the hard fork the one that breaks them.
https://youtu.be/U2yAcsj7P_E?list=PLUl4u3cNGP61KHzhg3JIJdK08JLSlcLId
In these clases they explain the subject very well, especially scenarios regarding the mining support of different types of forks.
reply
0 new comment
40 sats \ 3 replies \ @sommerfeld 17 Oct 2022
It's not a new rule, any other miner is free to build on a chain tip with non-empty blocks and the attacking miner is also building on non-empty blocks since he does not have 100% of the hash power.
The ruleset is not decided by the majority hash power holder. Not a soft fork.
reply
0 new comment
220 sats \ 2 replies \ @l0k1 17 Oct 2022
Yep, it's simply a 51% attack.
reply
0 new comment
25 sats \ 1 reply \ @sandbeach123old 17 Oct 2022
Got it, my bad. Indeed it's an attack. I guess a fork would need many other conditions to be met.
view all 1 replies
176 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 17 Oct 2022
It's like they think the whitepaper is a contract legally forbidding "dishonest" behavior rather than describing how to disincentivize it.
Also, my brain hurts every time they call BSV Bitcoin.
reply
0 new comment
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @sandbeach123old 17 Oct 2022
I feel the same way
reply
0 new comment
65 sats \ 0 replies \ @newnym 17 Oct 2022
I think you posted in the wrong section. Should have posted under the Meme Mondey thread. ;)
reply
0 new comment
131 sats \ 0 replies \ @purpurato 17 Oct 2022
A joke that tells itself
reply
0 new comment
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @02947a7fb5 19 Oct 2022
Clearly consensus says empty blocks is better than blocks with transactions. Lmao. This is fun to watch.
reply
0 new comment
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @Pine 18 Oct 2022
It’s so fun to watch BSV going down
reply
0 new comment
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @timechain 18 Oct 2022
To people mentioning how not decentralized this is, Craig frequently says "he" (Satoshi) never wanted Bitcoin to be decentralized. Which is untrue. Decentralized is a term we got from Satoshi.
reply
0 new comment
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @dtonon 17 Oct 2022
This association/website doesn't really exist, right?!
Great joke!
reply
0 new comment
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @pi 17 Oct 2022
DINO 🤡
reply
0 new comment
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @jose 17 Oct 2022 freebie
🤡
reply
0 new comment