pull down to refresh
How it started...
https://video.nostr.build/f8b7bf8ef332abcda39b9baa92cafac3e04482f5b486eaf92bb98cfd17ef6639.mp4
How is going...
lol, quite funny though how they talked about how important self-custody is and then showed WoS
Lol they say it 'doesn't work'. Or it's 'trash' or 'no good'.
Lol OK... as I sit and stack Lightning sats (and zap for good posts) here on Stacker News.
Maybe I'm incompetent, but I've once used LN to withdraw some sats from Stacker News, and doing so wasn't cheaper than transacting on-chain: I constantly didn't have enough inbound(?) liquidity, pushing me to either buy liquidity or pay higher fees.
You are in that situation because you didn't read ALL my guides...
Very probable.
LN is not Bitcoin.
It is an abstraction, removed one degree from the Bitcoin blockchain.
LN may be fine for small - medium size payments and transactions, but only a fool would hodl large sums on LN.
LN for spending.
Bitcoin for savings.
USE LIGHTNING NETWORK
Onchain is only for opening/closing Ln channels.
LN is THE payment network of Bitcoin.