pull down to refresh

It's now only rank 1 to 4 that get most rewards and below I can see a huge difference.
šŸ¤” CC: @k00b @ek
Rewards are given based on proportion of value so are nonlinear and likely fit a power law.
reply
Power law šŸ‘€
There was already so much power law applied. When more value stackers zap the content that goes up and bags more attention churning more rewards.
I see what you're upto.
Creating an empire for yourself, where you're the king.
Anyways King is King šŸ‘‘! And always right!!
reply
0 sats \ 18 replies \ @ek 4 Jan
Everyone in the top 10, except for me, spent more than they will receive in rewards:
Whereas you spent only 266 sats and will receive over 1k in rewards:
reply
I'm not talking about me. I'm talking about the huge difference between No. 1 to 4 and 5.
What's the use of rewards if you need to spend them all before you earn?
BTW, I've not zapped more today because blink is taking 10 sats as minimum fees. I already mentioned it.
reply
0 sats \ 11 replies \ @ek 4 Jan
Same explanation. 1-4 spent a lot more.
If you're not referring to your own rewards, I would suggest avoiding snarky comments like #836081.
reply
So, rewards are given for spending more?
Why not @Undisciplined at the top when he has clearly outspent everyone else.
That wasn't snarky but sarcastic. He's at the top so he's the king.
Ohhh wow šŸ˜² The Kingsman penalised me for asking.
Great job!!
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 4 Jan
Still sarcasm I assume
reply
Haha! Or, what else can I do for losing 500 sats?
15 to 30 in an hour!! Incredible!!!
where is this from?