pull down to refresh

Rewards are given based on proportion of value so are nonlinear and likely fit a power law.
Power law πŸ‘€
There was already so much power law applied. When more value stackers zap the content that goes up and bags more attention churning more rewards.
I see what you're upto.
Creating an empire for yourself, where you're the king.
Anyways King is King πŸ‘‘! And always right!!
reply
0 sats \ 18 replies \ @ek 4 Jan
Everyone in the top 10, except for me, spent more than they will receive in rewards:
Whereas you spent only 266 sats and will receive over 1k in rewards:
reply
I'm not talking about me. I'm talking about the huge difference between No. 1 to 4 and 5.
What's the use of rewards if you need to spend them all before you earn?
BTW, I've not zapped more today because blink is taking 10 sats as minimum fees. I already mentioned it.
reply
0 sats \ 11 replies \ @ek 4 Jan
Same explanation. 1-4 spent a lot more.
If you're not referring to your own rewards, I would suggest avoiding snarky comments like #836081.
reply
So, rewards are given for spending more?
Why not @Undisciplined at the top when he has clearly outspent everyone else.
That wasn't snarky but sarcastic. He's at the top so he's the king.
reply
Most of my spending was not rewards eligible. I was paying my rent for the year.
There are reasons why it wouldn't just be who zapped the most, though. You should read the FAQ and guide at the bottom of the page, if you want to know all the considerations that go into rewards.
Alternatively, you can just zap bigly and not worry about it.
Ohhh wow 😲 The Kingsman penalised me for asking.
Great job!!
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 4 Jan
Still sarcasm I assume
reply
Haha! Or, what else can I do for losing 500 sats?
15 to 30 in an hour!! Incredible!!!
reply
19 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 4 Jan
It’s not just what you did in this hour, it’s also what everyone else did.