pull down to refresh

Interesting offer! Is the number of CCs unlimited or cap at certain amount? How have you defined the peg 100/1? or is just a kind of airdrop give-away? Do you offer the sats too, I mean 1sat for 100CCs?
Is the number of CCs unlimited or cap at certain amount?
I pinned #837512 that explains that you should reply first before you expect me to trade with you. So consider this offer to be gone at any time at my discretion.
How have you defined the peg 100/1?
I pulled it out of my ass.
or is just a kind of airdrop give-away?
How can this be considered a give-away? I am buying CCs and I am offering 1 sat for every 100 CCs.
Do you offer the sats too, I mean 1sat for 100CCs?
What do you mean with "too"? I only offer sats. I am buying 100 CCs for one satoshi. I don't sell CCs.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @AG 5 Jan
neat!
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 5 Jan
Is my post confusing? Could I have written it better?
It sounds like many didn't understand that I am not a market maker. I am just someone who wants to buy CCs at 100:1, not 1:1 as is possible in /credits.
reply
55 sats \ 0 replies \ @AG 5 Jan
Well, it's hard to define something straight forward in a multicultural space like this. For example, the title could also have been: [SELL] 1sat for 100 cowboy credits
Anyway, what's confusing is maybe the fees related with the SN system. You could have suggested a perfect deal process like:
  1. comment below if interested, mentioning the amount of sats you want and your preferred LN address (if different from the SN one)
  2. due to SN sybil fees (at your cost), I'll expect you to zap my response to your comment 142ccs/sat, so if you want 10 sats, zap my comment 1420ccs
  3. I'll send the sats to the LN address you mention in the first comment or directly to your@stacker.news
This is just an option, I believe there are many other ways to close the deal. Focusing on being transparent and making it easier for the buyer is always a good strategy.
I'm also assuming sending ccs to other stackers is possible exclusively via zapping comments.
reply