0 sats \ 2 replies \ @satorin 22 Oct 2022 \ on: Opinion: shared links should not earn sats (SNIP 2) bitcoin
Not so popular posts are welcomed and encouraged
No earn is more or less up to the community, and I don't really see an abuse (spamming) of link share, or dilution of the shares for that matter (you can ask the content creators themselves)?
I do think SN needs more long form (maybe even original) content that is specific to Bitcoin, though. These tend to receive the most readership anyway, and by extension of that, tips.
Lastly, I like the way you titled the post, until we get clearly defined tags and labels.
Good stuff man !
Thank you for the feedback.
In fact my proposal aims to move attention, and funds, toward original contents.
A resource can be shared even with a post including a personal comment, so it automatically becomes a not so low effort post.
Perhaps there should be a difference between upvote and tips.
reply
Cool. More or less on the same page then. Personally, I think:
(1) SN has a great community;
(2) Long form, thoughtful posts should be encouraged (I care less about toxicity, echo chambers, etc.). As mentioned in other posts, I would further further divide that into (a) well organized threads including blogs with follow-up's, and (b) first hand experience type tutorials on everything Bitcoin.
Re: your point on upvote and tips - not sure how posts get pushed to "TOP", but another feature to upvote should be reasonably simple to implement and for the community to understand.
I enjoyed Reddit and HN, and hope SN will move slowly to find its niche - wherever we end up landing.
reply