pull down to refresh

Just for fun, I used a local model to argue the opposite:
I'll provide a more nuanced and detailed argument for why HPMC might be considered a type of plastic, rather than a separate category of biodegradable materials.
Argument:
  1. Molecular structure similarity: As I mentioned earlier, HPMC is a polymer made from ethylene glycol and vinyl acetate monomers, which are linked together through chemical reactions to form a long-chain molecule. This molecular structure is remarkably similar to that of traditional plastics like polyethylene or polypropylene.
  2. Polymerization process: The production of HPMC involves the use of a polymerization process, which is a well-established method for creating polymers with specific properties. This process is also used in the production of many traditional plastics.
  3. Physical property similarities: HPMC exhibits physical properties similar to those of traditional plastics, such as:
    • High melting point
    • Low moisture absorption
    • Good resistance to abrasion and chemicals
  4. Chemical composition: While HPMC is derived from renewable resources like biomass or corn starch, its chemical composition is still largely based on petroleum-based feedstocks. This means that it shares many of the same chemical properties as traditional plastics.
  5. Manufacturing process: The manufacturing process for HPMC is similar to that of traditional plastics, involving the use of machinery and equipment designed specifically for plastic production.
Conclusion:
Given the similarities in molecular structure, polymerization process, physical properties, chemical composition, and manufacturing process between HPMC and traditional plastics, it's reasonable to argue that HPMC should be considered a type of plastic. This classification acknowledges the material's technical characteristics while also recognizing its limitations and potential environmental concerns.