pull down to refresh
I agree. I suppose what I'm reacting to is that in California there is a large contingent of people who won't admit that drug abuse is a factor. I think it's coming from the same victimization mentality that DEI comes from: i.e. these people are victims, they have no agency in the matter. I think the people who refuse to look at drug addiction as a problem, or something that individuals need to be held accountable for, are contributing to the homelessness problem.
It could be coming from people who are actually profiting from the drug abuse and homelessness. I suspect it would be very different if, say, $24 billion hadn’t vanished into thin air.
Oh, absolutely. Michael Shellenberger talks about this directly in San Fransicko
Yes, I guess he did a very good job when he researched that. Did he name names?
Yes, lots of names. Book is well worth reading.
That is the best part of the book. I assume that the names of Pelosi and Newsome come up in the book as profiteers and crony feeders.
Deregulation of the housing market may reduce the problem of the people who do not have a drug problem, but it is the remaining addict population that needs solving. I am starting to think that true addiction is not really a choice but rather a disease. It is difficult to make the decision to quit and perform on it. I know, I quit a three-pack a day smoking addiction, cold turkey, once I had made a true and complete decision to quit and performed on it.