pull down to refresh

Non Paywalled here - https://archive.is/Iaf2s
Amid the rising buzz around Ozempic and similar weight-loss drugs, a group of 58 researchers is challenging the way obesity is defined and diagnosed, arguing that current methods fail to capture the complexity of the condition. They offer a more nuanced approach.
The group’s revised definition, published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology1 on 14 January, focuses on how excess body fat, a measure called adiposity, affects the body, rather than relying only on body mass index (BMI), which links a person’s weight to their height. They propose two categories: preclinical obesity, when a person has extra body fat but their organs work normally, and clinical obesity, when excess fat harms the body’s organs and tissues.
This is interesting. Finally were seeing BMI and Ozempic being debunked?
Conventional methods lead to unnecessary treatment for some people while missing others who need help, he says. To address this, Rubino and his colleagues propose a system for diagnosing obesity that goes beyond BMI, combining it with other methods such as measuring waist circumference, which is a proxy for adiposity, or body scans using low-level X-rays, which can directly measure fat mass.
For now, we can just wait and watch if this new measure will be applied. But imho, we can fight with fat quite easily by maintaining a healthy lifestyle, working out properly, doing some yoga routines and ignoring the yumyum secreted for fast food or unhealthy food.
Are we allowed to call anyone obese anymore?
reply
Yes, if someone has more fat than needed, we can call him and obese. You should check your health records. ;)
reply
I was only obese by BMI standards, which I’ve heard are now defunct!
reply
How can you say you're not obese from the new standards? Have you got X Rayed for fat?
reply
Broke the machine
reply
20 sats \ 4 replies \ @nout 5h
Didn't fit into the machine?
reply
Yes, his tail didn't fit in there.
⛓️‍💥❤️‍🩹
reply
Probably not in Commiefornia, but the rest of us are allowed to say what we want.
reply
Nice one! 😂
reply
Ha!
reply
Ha! Take it.
You can't say cuz you're Commiefornia's biggest hypocrite fatshamed uptail coward woof woof.
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @random_ 2h
BMI takes into account weight, height and age.
The BMI scale changes significantly from age 20 to age 21.
The healthy range suddenly becomes much smaller.
reply
Yes, but noone really talks about it, not even the docs. Why so sudden change?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @random_ 2h
Tinfoil hat on?
So they can underrepresent childhood obesity.
Nontinfoil hat?
Metabolism changes or some shit.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @Aardvark 4h
I think any decent doctor should know that BMI is a tool, not a hard and fast rule, but honestly, if you're obese on the BMI scale, you could probably lose some weight.
reply
Yes, I agree. In fact anyone can lose weight by strong will power. It doesn't really matter how fat he is. The medicines won't make people thin.
reply
To tie into a previous ~HealthAndFitness post, this would move obesity more towards being a disease, since it would rely on biological markers of disfunction.
I hadn't really thought much about it, but doctors probably shouldn't be prescribing medical treatments to people based on their weight alone. There ought to be some actual symptoms of disease.
reply
Correct. I missed that to tie it here. Obesity isn't a disease and doctors prescribing medicine only on the basis of it need to stop.
This study clearly indicates that BMI isn't and shouldn't be the only measure for obesity. Let's hope the doctors would follow it.
reply
American doctors would need the AMA or their pharma rep to tell them to. They're good little lap dogs and will obediently do as they're told.
reply
Yes, you're right. This is same everywhere. But I think people would change them once there's enough and correct education on health and fitness. I think after COVID people have started to put stress on educating themselves more on fitness.
reply