pull down to refresh
10 sats \ 11 replies \ @denlillaapan OP 24 Jan \ parent \ on: Why I Don't Think the Green Fads/Climate Change Worries Last econ
Reject the premise.
It's just not true, a) as a statement or fact, b) as a credible, reliable prediction for the future.
I'm not trying to take it as a premise but I'm worried having listened to more and more powerful calamities happening around the world than were in my life's past. I don't look it from either of capitalist or communist perspective/propoganda but I feel that there's no harm in planting more trees.
I do it and I encourage everyone to do it. I'm also against the whatever plantation or green coridor development projects that the world is focused at in the deserts.
Overall I mean that we need to have an open mind to the climate concerns and the need to sustainable development.
reply
Saying that does not make it true.
Your statement is not backed by the overwhelming majority of science.
Climate change is accepted by the vast majority of scientists, and you are not one.
reply
Hello communism friendly bot! ;)
reply
Hello troll who cannot respond to the facts and issues raised so instead seeks to shoot the messenger...
reply
Hello human being the bot!
So now you've adopted to start-stop functionality. Well done. At least our trolling has changed the way you previously used to reply.
reply
You consistently avoid the facts and issues raised.
You have not refuted them...or even addressed them.
You only demonstrate, repeatedly, that when your dogma is challenged you respond by attacking the messenger...rather than with reason and logic.
reply
Should bots have rights or rites?
reply
Should respondents like @IamSINGLE who fail to provide any credible response to the facts and issues raised be able to avoid the logic, norms and expectations of a reasoned contest of ideas by falsely calling the first commenter a bot or are they simply exposing themselves as lazy bad faith trolls, who repeatedly avoid reasoned debate?
reply
The overwhelming majority of "scientists" are a combination of idiots with narrow-minded focus on singular, isolated topics (that don't add up to the massive eschatological story they tell).
What they say—more importantly, what extreme distortions get propagated through think-tanks and journalists—matters not.
reply
I could equally say exactly the same of Libertarians - but without even approaching and addressing directly the subject matter it would be simply empty and lazy rhetoric- as is yours.
reply
Libertarians
Again!!
reply