Nodes can't effectively implement something like a sanction list with relay policy alone.

As soon as a miner includes a transaction in a block, relays have no choice but to add it to the chain. I suppose they can refuse to relay all block data and purely listen, but they can't selectively relay valid blocks unless they have very high certainty miners won't build on those valid blocks they dislike. If even a small percentage of nodes are relaying the valid blocks, miners will quickly learn about them.

As for implementation of such a sanction list via policy around unconfirmed transactions, they would need to have something like 95% of the nodes on the network agreeing with them and be certain no miner learns about the transactions they don't like via any other means (eg transaction accelerator services)

See @murch's answer to my question in this thread: #348402

Nodes enforce consensus through what they will accept as consensus valid, not through their policies about what transactions they will relay.

TimeStamps: 00:04:56 - Ledger co-founder David Balland was kidnapped for ransom 00:12:06 - Mullvad VPN adds Lightning payments 00:17:09 - My Impressions Of The Bitcoin Ecosystem Investor Day 00:26:37 - Bitcoin needs a censor 00:46:11 - ROSS IS FREE 00:54:10 - I Exposed Crypto Scams at an Ordinals Conf in Hong Kong 00:56:42 - Early Days with Lightning Bounties 00:57:45 - Examples of culture being downstream from technology? 01:03:55 - Learning to code: My MVP as inspired by PlebDev 01:05:43 - Hacking Subaru: Tracking and Controlling Cars via the STARLINK Admin Panel 01:09:59 - The power of being lazy. 01:13:03 - Operation Saylor - Episode 31/120 01:13:56 - Breez has raised $5M to bring bitcoin payments to every app 01:14:59 - Help me make sense of the Stargate project

Loved the show, thanks for the hard work making clips and timestamps @Wumbo