pull down to refresh
10 sats \ 11 replies \ @0xIlmari 12h \ parent \ on: Addressing compliance confusion wrt Tether and Taproot Assets bitcoin
Did you skip the part where I said "doesn't really feel like AI"? I use LLMs a lot and I've gotten very good at detecting AI text.
But that's a "trust me bro" argument, so I backed it up with a gptzero.me check.
Why? Because it is also very good. I tested it extensively, tried to confuse it with mixed synthetic and human text and it wasn't fooled. I have no reason to think it's not an accurate tool.
You behave like a Luddite. You have decreed all AI to be garbage and refuse to use it even if it would help you. For example to retouch your guides and make them more readable.
For example to retouch your guides and make them more readable.
NO! That's the human touch.
refuse to use it even if it would help you
"help" me like this? To became a brainless monkey?
reply
reply
yeah a tool to convert people in zombies under a communist regime, where only what the shitGPT is saying is considered truth.
reply
reply
I speak english because is the only language you speak. I speak 4 languages.
I make intentional mistakes EXACTLY to differentiate from bullshit "AI"...
reply
People care more about content and readability than whether it was edited or written by an LLM. In that sense, intentional mistakes lower the value of your contributions.
There's a few regular posters here on SN that write their articles using an LLM, or with LLM assistance, and I have receipts to prove it. They get a lot of zaps, from me as well, because the effort still produced a valuable product.
We have maybe 99% of content these days written by bots. They wouldn't do it, unless the consumers were fine with it. And apparently they are.