pull down to refresh

Boomers, 1946-1946 roughly speaking, had mostly nice, cushy lives, their benefits and standings in life owing very little to their own efforts. They were, wrote The Economist last year, "the luckiest generation in history."

Insert anger and outrage.

Most of the cohort, which numbers 270m across the rich world, have not fought wars. Some got to see the Beatles live. They grew up with strong economic growth. Not all are rich, but in aggregate they have amassed great wealth, owing to a combination of falling interest rates, declining housebuilding and strong earnings.
Now in retirement, having, you know, comfortably ridden the wave of stock market and housing booms, what are they doing with their exorbitant wealth?
The question matters for more than just suppliers of cruises and golf clubs. Boomers have deep pockets, so their spending choices will exert a huge influence on global economic growth, inflation and interest rates. And it turns out boomers are remarkably stingy—not just in America but across the rich world.
They are not spending their wealth, but trying to preserve or even increase it. The big question for the economy in the 2020s and 2030s will not be why boomers are spending so much, as many had anticipated. It will be why they are spending so little.
Some pretty insane stats there too: Boomers, 20% of population, own 52% of its net wealth. Where is the inequality crowd on this?!
Also, this thesis has been in the works for a while but I haven't seen much on Pradhan/Goodhart recently:
A growing number of free-spending boomers will demand goods and services from a shrinking pool of workers, leading to high wage inflation. As boomers shift from accumulating wealth to spending it, the global balance between savings and investment will shift, leading to higher interest rates, suggest Charles Goodhart and Manoj Pradhan, perhaps the most famous proponents of this view.
These topics aren't unrelated to the baby gap (#872866).
Many boomers recognise how lucky they are to have accumulated such enormous wealth. They want to pass it on to their children, many of whom are struggling to buy a house or pay school fees.
Eventually, the dudes die, and hand over their outsized wealth to descendants/the government so eventually this all gets corrected huh? Not so fast:
Many boomers will live to 100 and beyond, meaning lots will spend a third of their lives in retirement. This poses a financial burden, especially for those who may eventually need round-the-clock medical care.

OK, stackers—bring on the anger. Good/bad/unfair/none-of-your-business??
non-paywalled here: https://archive.md/6FvMp
I've said it before and I'm sure I'll say it again. Over 12,000 people starve to death on this planet daily. I'm not going to be salty that a generation of people were marginally more lucky than I am.
reply
reply
57 sats \ 1 reply \ @Aardvark 2 Feb
Sure I can think about the boomers having more, and having an easier time than me. I can dwell on it and make myself miserable. Or I can be thankful for what I have.
That doesn't mean I'm against improving my life, but there's always going to be people that had/have it better.
reply
Baby boomers are an annoying and narcissistic generation
reply
This Obama style "you didn't build this" mentality is what causes revolutions- French or Bolshevik.
reply
Oh, boomers certainly built a lot of the crap we're suffering under.
On the ultimate day/final analysis, they will answer for those crimes
reply
Jealousy is an easy substitute for personal responsibility. Many boomers have been lucky. I was. Others had to deal with losing their homes in 2008, and then figuring out how to feed their families. I have friends who never recovered. Their life savings have been debased over thirty years right when they need it for retirement. Nixon in 1971 did no one any favors.
reply
your fellow boomers who lost their homes in 2008... did they lose their homes because they were over leveraged?
My parents (silent generation) got 'unlucky' during the 1990s but recovered after 2001.
reply
I guess so, but it's hard to judge overleveraged if they're unsophisticated, and they have never seen housing prices drop in their lifetime. In 2008 it was a fast, enormous drop in value. All the so called experts were saying everything was fine. It looks obvious in the rear view mirror.
reply
True
One story that never got enough attention was federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2007. That was a harbinger of disaster in the housing market. I remember thinking why aren’t more people freaked out by this event…
The neoliberals of the 1980s did most of the damage. Just as the Libertarians are continuing on with the same proven to fail and proven to enable corporate rentseeking 'free markets fix everything' nonsense.
Mixed economies where cartels and monopolies are strictly regulated are more productive than the crony capitalism that neoliberalism has delivered.
Liberalism does not fix this...it just continues the same fallacies and empowers the market monopolists and crony capitalism.
Today China is building global infrastructure at a rate never equaled by the west even when the west was a largely functional mixed economy-1930-70.
Will Libertarians one day answer for their naive misguided dogma undermining western civilisation?
reply
9 sats \ 6 replies \ @nichro 21h
Will Libertarians one day answer for their naive misguided dogma undermining western civilisation?
You think libertarians are steering the ship of Western civilization?
reply
Yeah, I'm very confused where this dude is looking.
No place where "libertarian" notions rule
reply
Correct (and for good reason) but they do predominate in certain circles including SNs and Bitcoin, and influence the narrative creating hostility toward government, voter apathy, and thus ideal conditions for rentseeking corporate parasites....just as neoliberalism did.
of course not
Libertarians are not relevant lol
reply
Libertarians are a continuation of the neoliberal 'government is bad' 'markets solve everything' nonsense. The neoliberals certainly degraded western civilisation and the Libertarians want to continue in the same greed is good climate change denial corporate rentseeking servility, and resultant societal and economic descent.
You think mixed economies, or China = functional, is the foundation of western civ??
reply
Show us an empire that gained wealth and power without the crucial role of the government being central to its success?
SILENCE.
Governments are crucial to the wealth of nations and always have been.
The Chinese government regulates and controls big capital deliberately and particularly where it seeks to rentseek or manipulate the market at the expense of the wider economy - this used to also be the case in western liberal democracies at least until the neoliberals captured our governments via patronage.
The western governments and economies are today corrupted, directed by big capital. (AKA crony capitalism) This is where your Libertarian/neoliberal (market knows best) dogma/narrative gets us to- economic and societal ruin and inability to compete with China where the government crushes rentseeking corporates who would weaken the wider economy.
reply
I think that last point is the key. Boomers are mostly planning on being retired for a long time, with little in the way of new earnings and lots in the way of looming medical expenses.
They will pass nothing down to their kids, it will all be spent on them.
They will be the first generation ever to both inherit from their parents and leave nothing for their kids.
reply
And peeps don't think there are grounds for generational anger here?!
Unbelievable, really.
reply
Honestly, I would be fine with it, if not for their prevailing smugness and sense of entitlement.
reply
Pun def intended!
reply
But that is not the case in China where the mixed economy regulates rentseeking cartels and enables ever higher productivity- the outlook is bright for Chinese people as the US empire sinks into the filth created by Neoliberals and Libertarians whose inane free market dogma empowered the rentseeking cartels to own your governments.
Will Libertarians and their Neoliberal predecessors be held responsible for the decline of western civilisation?
reply
42 sats \ 0 replies \ @000w2 2 Feb
Inflation. Next question.
reply
While baby boomers do own a larger portion of cash balances and assets of that population set how many are holding the wealth?
I venture to say a minority, yes theres a large middle class of boomers too but not every boomer did well, there's plenty of them eating into their reserves, finding out they didn't save enough, having to sell their homes and move into a smaller place and finding out the "profit" they made scaling down is nowhere near enough to live the next 10/20/30 years and they don't have the kids to fall back on either
We already seeing products like cash out refis/reverse mortgages growing so these people can get cash in hand to live, having wealth overweighted real estate is coming back to haunt some of them
While they might still get entitlements and pensions because their are young people paying in, taxed in and inflation funding it, I don't know if that will be enough to bail them out.
reply
That's right, and I think the article openly admits that. (There's an entire book on the topic out last year, some sociology lady making a big fuss about how there akschually are poor boomers.)
Not sure I care, honestly? There's always variability around a group mean
reply
Don't disagree with you at all and I am not simping for boomers, you all had x amount of years to work within the parameters and conditions given to squirrel away something for yourself as does this generation.
As a millennial I do think it's relatively harder to save and build a life for yourself versus previous generations but I also see millennial willingly cooking themselves and I have no sympathy for them either
reply
Yes the Boomers raised a generation of bleating spoilt brats who call themselves Libertarians.
reply
All three of them?
No, boomer raised millennials, the whiny, eschatological, rule-complying, and altogether retarded generation. They don't even know the word "libertarian"
reply
Safe to say a fair number of millennials (born in the 1990s and early 2000s) are Libertarians.
Quite a few here on SNs in fact.
Fair to say though Libertarians of all ages don't accept or even understand the crucial role government has in the generation of the wealth of nations.
That misunderstanding of fundamental principles of human society and power projection is harmful to the society that embraces it. Neoliberalism demonstrated that already.
reply
The gov doesn't have a crucial role in generating wealth and wellbeing. This is clear as a matter of logic and history.
And no, I doubt millennials at large have more libertarian ideas, self identified or not. (Though will search around for some surveys).
And drop "neolib," sir. It just tells me you're an idiot
reply
Show us an empire that gained wealth and power without the crucial role of the government being central to its success?
SILENCE.
Governments are crucial to the wealth of nations and always have been.
Neoliberals as in the Bush era and the Thatcher era- right through until at least the GFC 2008 when the shit finally hit the fan - the neoliberal 'intellectuals' and influencers (actually bankers and other corporate lobbyist - rentseekers) who espoused the idea of free markets will fix it and that the government will just make a mess. Your desperate desire to cancel the use of this word appears to stem from the fact that your Libertarian nonsense has already been applied- by Neoliberal Boomers, and proven to fail!
reply
I am a boomer. Born before the end of the (quasi) gold standard. When it made sense to save. Over the lifetime of Boomers we have seen the logic of the monetary and financial system change- subtly but radically. When at school we Boomers were told to save- it made sense then, and most did. But when the gold standard was removed and later when the neoliberals took control and deregulated banking everything changed. It no longer made sense to save- instead you were much better off the more debt you got and put into real estate or other income earning and inflation resistant assets. Since the gold standard was removed the era of debt has developed. The young are mired in debt- often for education or consumption. And not all Boomers saw the change and invested in real estate or stocks- some stuck with the savings model and saw their savings decimated. Todays Liberatarians rant much the same garbage as the neoliberals- markets fix everything- government is bad blah blah blah. The supreme irony is Libertarians championing Bitcoin when Bitcoin has already been captured and controlled by the bankers who gained control under their neoliberal predecessors. The fastest growing economy today is China- a mixed economy where the government regulates capital and mostly prevents market capture by rentseeking parasitic corporate bankers- instead in USA the rentseeking parasites are now fully in control of the government. Young Chinese can reasonably look forward to a future that is brighter and more prosperous than their parents because this is the trend in China for the last 40 years and because the mixed economy of China is more effective and productive and competitive than USAs crony capitalism.
reply