pull down to refresh

I think a lot of Kurxweil’s predictive successes come from his difference from other prognosticators: he does not predict using linear progressions, he uses hyperbolic and logarithmic models. They seem to be much more accurate in predicting future technology. Now, I would wonder if the same models would work in a world populated by only 500,000,000. Especially if that remainder of the population was thoroughly dumbed down by the overlords to insure their continued overlordship of the world. I think THEY are well on the way to killing the whole planet with THEIR chemtrails, mRNA and depopulation vaccines. Not only the humans but all of the animals and insects, too. If they reach a low enough CO2 all of the plants will die, and THEY are getting closer to that limit by THEIR carbon elimination schemes, every year. How they ever convinced the population that carbon dioxide was a pollutant, I will never understand, but they did it to much of the world’s population.
also wonder if that model will work in a bitcoin world and not a fiat world (endless printing worthless papers)...
example: how much IOU BTC is capable to "buy" Saylor with another IOU papers.
reply
Boy, I don’t know if it can apply to BTC because there is an absolute endpoint to how many BTC are created. If you look at satoshis being the endpoint of usual use, then the hyperbolic model may just fit just fine when comparing BTC to fiat. I would rather not do that though. Because just like 1oz silver = 1oz silver forever 1BTC=1BTC forever. Comparing BTC to fiat is like comparing watermelons to cherry tomatoes, you just cannot do it.
reply