I found this in FreeDomain

Bitcoin Idealism vs Banking Published: September 20, 2023 Created: 2023

The examination of Bitcoin's role in the economic sphere indicates a significant departure from traditional market systems. Historically, market development, underpinned by concepts such as free market principles and private property rights, has operated in tandem with state mechanisms to enhance state power and fulfill imperial ambitions, thereby increasing wealth.

Bitcoin, however, emerges as a divergence from this historical pattern. It offers a form of capital protection against inflation and manipulation, eschewing service to imperialistic endeavors and corrupt financial practices. Its unique characteristic stems from an idealistic underpinning, a departure from serving the agendas of ruling entities.

The emergence of Bitcoin introduces a new paradigm in the motivations behind economic engagement. It garners interest from those with a moral inclination towards income redistribution and equality, contrasting with traditional capitalist motives predominantly centered on wealth accumulation. This digital currency challenges the traditional flow of wealth from economically disadvantaged groups to the affluent by eliminating inflationary tactics and the concentration of monetary control.

The prevailing economic decline casts Bitcoin in a contentious light among established authorities, as it presents a viable alternative to conventional stores of value, such as gold, and threatens to devalue traditional savings and retirement funds. In contrast to the conventional financial sector, often associated with cynicism and exploitation, proponents of Bitcoin carry a moralistic vision. Their refusal to sell Bitcoin signifies a stand against centralized financial control and a commitment to the ethos of a free society amidst growing governmental oversight.

The implications of Bitcoin's ascent extend to redefining the functions of central banking and currency perception. The entry of idealistic actors into the market presents a challenge to the established financial powers, echoing the spirit of cultural clashes seen in past meme wars where ideological creativity confronted established media narratives.

The fervor with which Bitcoin advocates pursue their goal of emancipating society from the constraints of traditional monetary overseers speaks to a deeply rooted moral crusade. In this unfolding scenario, a preference emerges in favor of the idealists, positioning the development of Bitcoin as a potent and uncertain element in the financial and social fabric. The discourse invites a broader engagement with these transformative events in the realm of currency and societal structure.

Both have changed their tune on bitcoin, I believe