Then let him bet against it and reap the rewards in 10 years. Those who understand Bitcoin’s potential and what it truly is will always want more and more. Let’s see in 10 years who will be right. The Nobel Prize in Economics can’t be taken seriously; it’s like the Nobel Peace Prize.
pull down to refresh
30 sats \ 5 replies \ @SimpleStacker 13 Feb
See:
#862916
#863751
#875931
reply
30 sats \ 4 replies \ @LibertasBR OP 13 Feb
Oh, thank you. I gonna see it
reply
30 sats \ 3 replies \ @denlillaapan 13 Feb
think I included that in my post. Fama didn't wanna take the bet (or longer than 10y) since he didn't expect to be alive to collect!
"Luigi made me put a term limit on it. I’d take 10 years because I’m 86 years old. The likelihood that I’m going to have to pay up on this one is pretty low."
#875931
reply
36 sats \ 2 replies \ @LibertasBR OP 13 Feb
I read both of your articles. I agree that climate science can be influenced, and we’ve seen this with ESG. The world has seemed on the brink of collapse for many years. We can’t ignore scientific data, but it always seems that they are more concerned with anything that subverts the current dogma.
Regarding what Fama said about rethinking economic theory—hasn’t the time already come? I understand that some are still waiting for stronger proof that Bitcoin won’t “fail,” but from my perspective, it’s already more than established that it won’t.
Thanks for sharing the articles; I should have researched before posting.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 13 Feb
Nah, there's no requirement that you've done a thorough search for every topic before you post :) It's the wild west out here, we shoot from the hip and that's alright.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 13 Feb
Haha that's ok, all good :)
reply