pull down to refresh

In the 2010s a new finance acronym made its entrance—TINA.

There is no alternative

This wasn't an early Bitcoin maxi stance, but a crass realization that savings had to go into stocks. Bank accounts paid zero, bonds traded at around (or even below!) zero, and central banks were printing like mayhem.
There was nowhere for surplus funds to go but stonks.
A plandemic, an inflation crisis and energy crisis later, plus orange man on the throne, with much higher rates, squeaking growth and fiscal and economic forecasts that look even more dire than last time orange man was in charge... we're still, somehow, in the same boat.
The mystery of the moment is why rampant speculation persists in the all-American bull market despite the apparent end of easy money. The exuberance was understandable when money was virtually free, but that was last decade. (#887642)
In the FT last week, Ruchir Sharma reflects on the many ways that America's financial markets remain broken—or at least supported by an indefinite stock market put: the one market "that the government allows to move in only one direction: up. With the economy strong and supported by the state, the US business bankruptcy rate is close to record lows (outside the pandemic)."
To keep growth alive during the pandemic, the Fed injected massive amounts of liquidity into the system. By some measures a lot of it is still coursing through the markets. Government spending stayed elevated well after Covid passed, leaving more cash in the hands of households and corporations. They, in turn, have invested heavily in stocks (or stock buybacks), confident that the state will mitigate losses.
How is this all going to unfold?
One way is that the price of money rises further, prompted possibly by higher inflation. Another is that a fiscal crisis or some other shock leaves the government unable to afford such generous bailouts and rescues. Until then, BTFD will remain the mantra for most investors.
One way or the other, this Everything Bubble will unwind. Maybe runaway inflation, Sharma says; maybe fiscal crisis.
How's that for a bout of optimism this otherwise fine morning?!

non-paywalled here: https://archive.md/Ervma
yup, they broke the financial system basically and forced everyone to be a stock trader if they wanted to stay ahead.
then MSM spends all its free time bashing bitcoin, the apex savior.
reply
surplus funds to go but stonks
Real Estate is far bigger issue than stonks
Both are case in point though why Bitcoin had to be created to foam the runway, a non-commodity money that could absorb debt destruction without taking society down with it
reply
Totally agreed
reply
There's a very real chance that bailouts won't be on the menu this time. Now that would be interesting.
I love the smell of financial armageddon in the morning. Get on the ₿oat
reply
The ability to bail out a chronically and increasingly un-competitive economy that has returned trade deficits for over five decades hinges upon the USDs global monetary hegemony. This today is the USAs most important strategic asset. But this foundational strategic asset is fading fast even though few see it let alone want to accept it.
The volume of trade now settled outside of the institutional and protocol based USD hegemony is growing - most of it via the Chinese alternative trade settlement system for which the US institutions have no access and no data. Once it was just N.Korea, then it included Iran and now Russia and increasingly other nations, quietly trading via the Chinese Yuan.
As the USD gradually loses its global hegemony there approaches the time when the gradual loss accelerates and becomes a rapid decline. Its not now a question of if, but when. Trump can bluster and threaten BRICS nations like Nero but as BRICS rapidly grows in membership and strength and as Chinas importance as a nation all others must trade with or lose advantage is firmly established, the US Emperor and his money printer are found increasingly debased and vulnerable.
Trumps humiliating appeasement of Putins Chinese backed military aggression is just a taste of what is to come as the decline of US resource and monetary hegemony accelerates.
reply