pull down to refresh
14 sats \ 8 replies \ @Aardvark 19 Feb \ parent \ on: Bitcoin and (Monetary) Economics—Properly (Bitcoin Policy Institute) econ
Ok Mr, not an economist, and can't speak well. 🙄
Obviously an educated economist and did wonderfully on the video.
Lies!
Thanks for your kind words, though :)
reply
This is probably a stupid idea so I apologize in advance. What about writing about how bitcoin is now intersecting with communication and social media? I don't really know enough to even be making a suggestion, so I'm sorry if I'm being annoying, it just popped into my head.
reply
Elaborate? Tell me more :)
reply
reply
was always a case for reputation, no?
ed.: plus, from Matt Levine's newsletter today yesterday:
Guess reputation/cost goes both ways?
reply
Sure, but in non bitcoin versions of social media (reddit) i had no incentive to care about my reputation or the content of my post. Being completely anonymous doesn't matter at all there, and neither does shit posting. On SN, even though I'm still anonymous, my reputation matters. I'm incentivized to learn more, and put effort into my posts. I can make 500 shit posts on reddit and it's meaningless. Here, it would cost me.