pull down to refresh

this territory is moderated
42 sats \ 2 replies \ @Murch 9h
Probably not, but only half of the newborns made it to age 15.
reply
So malnutrition would be a factor I guess so why wouldn’t they have done this if they have other sustenance they could feed them
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Murch 8h
I'm sure that access to additional milk was a great boon to children back then.
Food safety improvements like pasteurization reduce crap like salmonella, tuberculosis, and food poisoning that we can all do without.
Even in 1950 one in four newborns died in childhood.
reply
reply