pull down to refresh

Yes, we can do that easily enough. It ignores our zappers, though, but we shouldn't make the perfect the enemy of the good.
That's why I said manually. With that I meant we can assign the point to multiple or more points based on a specific criteria.
  • The best post overall gets 2 points.
  • The second best gets 1 point.
  • The best comment gets 2 points.
  • The second best gets 1 point.
We can also have multiple winners.
What amount of sats do you think would be a good amount for monthly reward?
reply
We should initially start it at something like 5k-10k. Long-term, it should be a fraction of monthly profits. That's similar to what @siggy47's doing with his ~bitcoin_beginners rewards.
reply
By this post I wanted to discuss about applying a sort of game/competition for the territory, but it's also not a bad idea. I think we should do the same as @siggy47's weekly newsletter for ~bitcoinbeginners. But we'll do it on a monthly basis. I suggest the top post gets 1k sats and other four get 500 sats.
We can also reward top 5 comments. 500 for the top and 200 to other 4.
There should be condition applied -
  • One Stacker can only get one reward, the highest will be eligible.
reply
Sounds good to me.
reply
Thanks. Let's see @realBitcoinDog and @grayruby approve it. #894820
Also, can we come up with a game/competition other than this?
When will Workit be available on Android?
reply
50 sats \ 4 replies \ @grayruby 3h
I approve of any and all experiments.
When will Workit be available on Android?
In a couple more months.
I think we could do a low stakes competition, based on your accountability posts. Using your super scientific points system, we could award 1k to whoever had the best month. That should be a light enough reward that people don't cheat to get it.