pull down to refresh
120 sats \ 6 replies \ @IamSINGLE OP 25 Feb \ parent \ on: Biological sex is not as simple as male or female science
What's fake in here?
I don't think the writer of this artical really meant for contaminants but this is what he meant.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_sex_determination
What's fake in here?
The shifting of emphasis from it being a correctable environmental problem to a social issue of lack of acceptance.
It would be like if I cut your arm off and then wrote articles saying: "We must accept IamSINGLE as he is and its societies problem for not accepting him....whatever 'environmental issues' resulted in him losing his arm are subordinate to the wider social issues of acceptance"
reply
The shifting of emphasis from it being a correctable environmental problem to a social issue of lack of acceptance.
Can you quote from the article where you see the shift of emphasis as you mentioned.
- First of all the writer is talking about sex determination not the environment.
- He's criticizing US president's recent order about sex.
- He also presents scientific descriptions to prove his point.
This, It simply addresses that Trump is wrong while signing the executive order that there are only two sexes — male and female.
(And we all know that there aren't only two. Don't we?)
reply
We do?
Where do you see the third, fourth, fifth etc? And what are you relying on to create/generate those categories?
reply
I meant it for the sexual orientation not for the genders.
There's a lot of misunderstanding when people talk interchangeably for sex and gender.
reply
Howso? What do you think is different about those convos?
reply
💯
Humans have can have any number of arms. It's arbitrary, a social construction
reply