pull down to refresh
stunning
How is inheritance flow a measure of output? It's one of the only voluntary transactions where one side definitely lost.
Don't think it is? They're just scaling it with gdp
That makes much more sense. I thought this was some really dumb Keynesian accounting pretending to be economic growth.
Hahaha :)Not even they are that silly, I hope
I mean, they count the wealth confiscated from the private sector by the state that gets spent on nonsense.
Sounds like the kind of article a nihilist loser uses to confirm their bias.
Should also note that the Economist is a Rothschild owned rag, the same Rothschild dynasty that needs people of the west give up hope, get in pods, and eat ze damn bugs.
No, only minority. We looked this up for Undisc for when he's acquiring the magazine
RE: Ownership?
Estates bigger than most countries don't divest of media assets, they use ratholes and trade to obfuscate ownership.
Sure whatever. But then the burden of proof is on you to show me that claim.Can't just blanket say that akschually there's something else going on
You're the one going ackshually they divested some of it but can't prove they surrendered control.
Nothing I said is incorrect, it being a Rothschild rag is an undisputed historical fact.
How do I prove a negative, asshole?
Largest owner is the FIAT (car) guy. It would seem Rothschilds are not the biggest owner.
Control? Go look inside the business. Can't just blanket "uh, duuuh it's the Jew!"
You can't, so maybe the ackshually they divested some of it was a stupid thing to say when you seemingly know full well its history?
I linked it on SN like three days ago. Public info. Go Google yourself before you out yourself as retarded
nice find, thank you!!
stunning
How is inheritance flow a measure of output? It's one of the only voluntary transactions where one side definitely lost.
Don't think it is? They're just scaling it with gdp
That makes much more sense. I thought this was some really dumb Keynesian accounting pretending to be economic growth.
Hahaha :)
Not even they are that silly, I hope
I mean, they count the wealth confiscated from the private sector by the state that gets spent on nonsense.
Sounds like the kind of article a nihilist loser uses to confirm their bias.
Should also note that the Economist is a Rothschild owned rag, the same Rothschild dynasty that needs people of the west give up hope, get in pods, and eat ze damn bugs.
No, only minority. We looked this up for Undisc for when he's acquiring the magazine
RE: Ownership?
Estates bigger than most countries don't divest of media assets, they use ratholes and trade to obfuscate ownership.
Sure whatever. But then the burden of proof is on you to show me that claim.
Can't just blanket say that akschually there's something else going on
You're the one going ackshually they divested some of it but can't prove they surrendered control.
Nothing I said is incorrect, it being a Rothschild rag is an undisputed historical fact.
How do I prove a negative, asshole?
Largest owner is the FIAT (car) guy. It would seem Rothschilds are not the biggest owner.
Control? Go look inside the business. Can't just blanket "uh, duuuh it's the Jew!"
You can't, so maybe the ackshually they divested some of it was a stupid thing to say when you seemingly know full well its history?
I linked it on SN like three days ago. Public info. Go Google yourself before you out yourself as retarded
nice find, thank you!!