pull down to refresh
28 sats \ 5 replies \ @denlillaapan 8h
stunning
reply
7 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined 6h
How is inheritance flow a measure of output? It's one of the only voluntary transactions where one side definitely lost.
reply
36 sats \ 3 replies \ @denlillaapan 6h
Don't think it is? They're just scaling it with gdp
reply
29 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 6h
That makes much more sense. I thought this was some really dumb Keynesian accounting pretending to be economic growth.
reply
24 sats \ 1 reply \ @denlillaapan 5h
Hahaha :)
Not even they are that silly, I hope
reply
19 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 5h
I mean, they count the wealth confiscated from the private sector by the state that gets spent on nonsense.
reply on another page
19 sats \ 10 replies \ @justin_shocknet 6h
Sounds like the kind of article a nihilist loser uses to confirm their bias.
Should also note that the Economist is a Rothschild owned rag, the same Rothschild dynasty that needs people of the west give up hope, get in pods, and eat ze damn bugs.
reply
0 sats \ 9 replies \ @denlillaapan 6h
No, only minority. We looked this up for Undisc for when he's acquiring the magazine
reply
19 sats \ 8 replies \ @justin_shocknet 6h
RE: Ownership?
Estates bigger than most countries don't divest of media assets, they use ratholes and trade to obfuscate ownership.
reply
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @denlillaapan 5h
Sure whatever. But then the burden of proof is on you to show me that claim.
Can't just blanket say that akschually there's something else going on
reply
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @justin_shocknet 5h
You're the one going ackshually they divested some of it but can't prove they surrendered control.
Nothing I said is incorrect, it being a Rothschild rag is an undisputed historical fact.
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @denlillaapan 5h
How do I prove a negative, asshole?
Control? Go look inside the business. Can't just blanket "uh, duuuh it's the Jew!"
view all 5 replies
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 9h
nice find, thank you!!
reply