pull down to refresh
40 sats \ 14 replies \ @Aardvark OP 13h \ parent \ on: How can we combat the obesity epidemic? AskSN
That didn't really stop smokers from smoking.
Are you sure? Smoking rates have collapsed.
reply
People got priced out IMO and now tobacco has direct competition with vapes.
reply
Vaping came on much later and still the rates are way below the high.
Getting priced out is part of what happens with product liability. The product immediately becomes more expensive to produce, so producers can't afford to push as much product at the same prices.
You might want to counter with taxes being the cause of higher prices, but I'd argue those are also downstream of acknowledging the health problems.
reply
I never met a smoker that didn't know it was killing them. When I started smoking I knew it was bad for me. I'd argue the taxes came from a greedy government taxing a product because they knew users couldn't quit. I don't think the negative health effects had much to do with that.
If knowing the risks prevented people from doing unhealthy things, nobody would be unhealthy.
reply
I almost never make absolute claims. People do and will continue to do any stupid thing you can think of. What matters are changes on the margins.
Yes, smokers are aware of the health problems, but there are fewer of them, now that people know about the health problems. Some people stopped and now smoking is a much smaller problem than it used to be.
Imagine if sugary, highly processed foods were 10x as expensive as they are now. Lots of people would change their habits and producers would substitute for the cheaper healthier alternatives.
There would still be obese people, but the epidemic might end.
reply
The 10x cost would come from tax in all likelihood. I imagine that would prevent people from eating as much, bit it would still be direct government intervention.
It would likely be effective, but you'd have to be willing to allow intervention to the free market.