pull down to refresh

What I disagree with is his definition of what "true capitalism" is. Who says capitalism is supposed to be debt free? I was under the impression that people wanted banks to act responsibly, and give loans based off actual reserves not a money they can conjure out of thin air.
His argument, while not without merit, is based on a strawman to begin with.
What do you think his argument is, that it suffers from that bad definition?
reply
35 sats \ 0 replies \ @Aardvark 17h
All of it, he set the definition for true capitalism and then argued against his own definition. Who's saying that true capitalism wouldn't have corporations? I'm not even sure exactly what is argument is besides utopia doesn't exist.
reply