de-dollarization was always more of a political slogan than a pecuniary fact, one that only Russia made tangible progress on but only because it was forced to, though it might soon rebalance as explained. They collectively form RIC, the core of BRICS, so whatever they say or do will influence comparatively smaller countries. There’s nothing wrong with that though, neither in general nor in this context.
pull down to refresh
related posts
We might see hyperdollarization before hyperbitcoinization.
I wonder how the SBR fits into the puzzle.
By giving the Sec of Commerce, that owns a good chunk of Tether, and the Bitcoiner Treasury Sec the tools to run the Saylor playbook: Issue paper (stablecoins) as the new off-shore dollar to accumulate Bitcoin while issuance monetizes the debt directly bypassing the Fed and the need for new debt issuance.
It doesn't, yet
me too
ftfy
"We're going to bitcoinize our great economy and stablecoin bagholders are going to pay for it!"
Astute!
De-dollarization or the digitalization of the dollar is clearly to track and "keep people in check". In the case of digital money, they can centrally decide what/from whom/where/when/etc you can buy with your own money.