pull down to refresh

Long-standing fears about fat’s impact on heart health seem to be dissipating: today, fat is in and it is carbohydrates, sugars and processed foods that are out.
...but most of the satured-fat fear is pretty outdated/debunked as far as I can tell?
Also, here we go, JAMA Internal Medicine long-run massive study:
those people who ate the most butter (averaging around one tablespoon per day) had a 15% increased risk of mortality compared with those who avoided the stuff. By contrast, people who consumed the most plant-based oils, such as canola, soyabean or olive oil—all of which have low levels of saturated fat—had a 16% lower mortality rate than those who consumed the least.
At the end they quote an epidemiologist objecting to an obvious problem with the study:
the voracious butter-eaters contained twice as many smokers, for example, as the butter-avoiders. He argues it is not possible to fully control for such differences, which means some non-dietary factors could be at play.
Like what... you do this massive, 33-year long study and don't control for smoking...? WTH.
Nah, I'm out: full butter nerd over here.

non-paywall here: https://archive.md/cCLjC
Certain things are bad for certain body types. We should really work upon understanding the dietry needs for our bodies. #908089
reply
38 sats \ 0 replies \ @Aardvark 12h
Most things aren't really bad for you in moderation. Butter certainly hasn't deserved the hate that it's gotten.
reply
Nutritional studies are mostly garbage. This seems like another such garbage study.
reply