pull down to refresh

The making of the bear case: DOGE and tariffs may not cause a recession, but all this "don't mind the stock market" on national TV could of course be a sign of nasty things to come.
One issue is, how do you get an economy addicted to government deficit spending off this drug?
Another issue is, how do you get Corporate America addicted to cheap labor overseas off this drug?
And a third issue is worming its way into the detox conversation: The stock market has gotten addicted to the government’s deficit spending, to the fat profit margins from offshoring production, and to the Fed’s erstwhile free-money policies, including trillions of dollars in money-printing, of which $2.2 trillion have so far been un-printed via QT.
They’re saying the right things, but it’s OUCH for stocks.

One thing we know from the past – and this may be even more the case now – a stock market rout after a majestic bubble, if deep enough and long enough, will trigger a recession.
We saw that during the Dotcom Bust. The S&P 500 plunged 50% and the Nasdaq plunged 78%, and it triggered a recession. In parts of the US that are depending on the stock market, it triggered a hard recession. In other parts of the country, there was barely a ripple. And it averaged out into a run-of-the-mill national recession.

I thought this was an interesting angle, even though it's a bit too bearish for my taste, and this may very well all be FUD.
This is very similar to what I've been saying. Any major change to economic policy will likely lead to a correction, because the incentives will have changed and resources will need to be reallocated to reflect that.
A recession is just a correction that takes a long time. That has less to do with the severity of the correction than it does the flexibility of the economy.
Deregulating alongside these changes to tariffs and DOGE should reduce the time it takes to reallocate resources to where they're most urgently needed.
reply
That has less to do with the severity of the correction than it does the flexibility of the economy.
Actually this is a really nice framing. Agility is key and this has been a huge issue in Europe the past few years. More agile national economies are doing pretty well despite inflation, and the sluggish ones are doing awful. From that perspective there's a lot of hope for the US.
Also, it's mostly psychological. We'll tighten our spending when we believe we're in a recession. This may very well be the logic behind the narrative to not watch the stock market too closely and focus on the long term - wouldn't surprise me to be honest and I'd say that's a smart move especially now that people are still listening.
PS: If this projected bear case will happen despite optimism, I do hope it can break the S&P-to-Bitcoin peg though, because that phase was very nice but it's time to move on.
reply
Economic detox is a recession, if not depression.
reply
I think the whole doge, austerity play is actually to push the recession narrative so they can twist the fed toward ZIRP again and get to a point where there's no resistance from either political side to print baby print
reply