pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @DarthCoin 19 Mar \ on: Stacker Saloon
@k00b I was trying to make a demo using SN with Blixt WebLN. Is it well known issue that WebLN is not working well in SN? I just wanted to zap from my Blixt wallet, using their WebLN browser with SN. Steps to reproduce:
  • open Blixt, go to Lightning Browser
  • open SN and login with LN, with the same Blixt. Works just fine.
  • go to my SN account wallets and set WebLN active. Logs says OK settings saved, appeared the green icon.
  • I didn't set a receiving LN address, that will be tested later and I could use the same Blixt LN address provided and keep it in persistent mode.
  • I went to a comment and zapped few sats for testing, but it was paid with CCs instead of sats from the same Blixt wallet.
Is it something that I am missing?
write
preview
121 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 19 Mar
I went to a comment and zapped few sats for testing, but it was paid with CCs instead of sats from the same Blixt wallet.
Are you sure the receiver had a wallet attached?
reply
25 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 19 Mar
Seems that they haven't, I tried with 2 stackers @0xbitcoiner and @Jon_Hodl But yeah, now it works and pretty cool process.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 19 Mar
Lightning Address? Yeah, I'm all set. Unless Coinos is being a pain, but I got sats earlier, no problem. In SN settings, there's a minimum amount to send sats instead of CCs.
log: this?
16m ERROR failed to wrap invoice: Estimated fees are too high (1273 > 1080)
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 19 Mar
@ek or @sox would be more familiar with WebLN. They've been the ones working on it recently.
reply
121 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 19 Mar
Which comment did you zap? If the person does not have a receiving wallet attached, we will default to using your CCs and save your precious sats.
reply
133 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 19 Mar
ah thank you sir to remind me that! definitely that was the problem. Now it worked, I just zapped you.
reply