Top Posts
- Zoom Out
- 13.1k sats \ 22 comments \ @kepford \ ~mostly_harmless \
April 1, 2024
- 13.1k sats \ 22 comments \ @kepford \ ~mostly_harmless \
- Saving Satoshi - Interactive Bitcoin Learning Game
- Vitalik Buterin's best work yet: "In Defense of Bitcoin Maximalism"
- 1473 sats \ 18 comments \ @eduardopro \ ~bitcoin \
April 1, 2022
- 1473 sats \ 18 comments \ @eduardopro \ ~bitcoin \
Top Stackers
- stacker is in hiding for
April 1, 2024 - @gmd
- 288 stacked \ 892 spent \ 0 posts \ 1 comment \
April 1, 2023
- 288 stacked \ 892 spent \ 0 posts \ 1 comment \
- @phaedrus
- 131 stacked \ 460 spent \ 0 posts \ 0 comments \
April 1, 2022
- 131 stacked \ 460 spent \ 0 posts \ 0 comments \
Top Comments
- #490234 on Meme Monday - Best Bitcoin Meme Gets 25,000 Sats
- 25.3k sats \ 1 reply \ @UCantDoThatDotNet \
April 1, 2024[...]
- 25.3k sats \ 1 reply \ @UCantDoThatDotNet \
- #159872 on SN Saturday Newsletter 4/1/23
- 782 sats \ 2 replies \ @sourcecreator \
April 1, 2023You guys got me with the BTC price tracker! Man! Hahaha [...]
- 782 sats \ 2 replies \ @sourcecreator \
- #17558 on Daily discussion thread
- 71 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b \
April 1, 2022The problem we have now is clusters of trusted users, perhaps managed by the same person, upvoting themselves. If they behave good long enough on each account, then they could upvote their own content with trusted accounts and there wouldn't be silence. We also have no way of determining whether a user saw something and didn't upvote it - unless of course we started tracking what users see which is a no go. [...]
- 71 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b \