pull down to refresh

132 sats \ 2 replies \ @nym 16 Apr \ on: Who pays for Bitcoin wallets? bitcoin
KISS. All these software are just tools to connect to the existing network. It doesn’t have to get complicated and expensive for the end users.
write
preview
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 16 Apr
I used simple bitcoin wallet for a while, then they went away (kinda, maybe they are back), so I used blue wallet for a bit. I like core, honestly, but making a multisig in core is not easy. And if I want my wife to be able to use it...so I go to one of the wallets that offers easier multisig.
Now there's taproot, and I'd totally pay for a good wallet that did FROST or MuSig2, but not many hardware signers support either, so I guess that is still Soon(TM).
Paying for software might increase the speed at which these sorts of features become available, but for now it mostly feels like donations or becoming a contributor to a project are the main ways for users to signal what they are interested in.
reply
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @nunchuk_io 22 Apr freebie
We added support for Taproot multisig/MuSig2 a while back to the free version of Nunchuk. You might want to check it out!
https://nunchuk.io/blog/taproot-multisig Sample UX of a Taproot/MuSig2 wallet: https://x.com/nunchuk_io/status/1872282670417564084
reply