pull down to refresh
77 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined 19 Apr
I wish this trend were real.
Alas, that's just Trump derangement. Those people will support trade restrictions, and for the same reasons, as soon as their guy is in office.
reply
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @zuspotirko OP 19 Apr
Maybe people use this precedent and learn about the virtues of free trade
reply
27 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 19 Apr
Trump should embrace free trade then support for tariffs will rise
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 19 Apr
That's what he'd do if he were really playing 4-D chess.
reply
15 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 19 Apr
That would be nice, but I'm not getting my hopes up. I've been through too many of these cycles for that.
reply
51 sats \ 3 replies \ @Butterfinger 19 Apr
The masses will always be the masses. Reading a book like human action is for a few nerds.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 19 Apr
Sadly, yes
reply
37 sats \ 1 reply \ @Butterfinger 19 Apr
The war is between those good nerds vs the bad nerds (like the davos crowd). The masses will always follows what is there to be followed.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 19 Apr
Lucky for us, the truth is on our side. We have a relatively easier lift.
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @justin_shocknet 19 Apr
Just shows how malleable shitlibs are, one mockingbird narrative and all of a sudden it looks like a shitcoin graph
No one alive has ever experienced free trade
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @zuspotirko OP 19 Apr
You probably mean lefties. Liberals have always been pro free trade and capitalism.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 19 Apr
Shitlibs are the "liberals" in the graph you posted, Classical Liberals are a statistical non-factor... even if they weren't, then to your point, the line would be flat because at least they're consistent.
All the graph shows us is that shitlibs have no principles and are therefore inconsistent.
reply