Great take! I agree with him.
pull down to refresh
51 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 3h
the 2nd OP_RETURN war started.... meanwhile... the blocks are empty ! LOL
ofc this will not stay forever
reply
31 sats \ 1 reply \ @Alice_and_the_Wonderland 4h
Natural law will decide in the long future if including such arbitrary data will still consistently gather necessity from people. To me, it's simple: I prefer Bitcoin to remain a ledger for money transactions only.
The market’s fee mechanics ensure that if you want to put extra data into the blockspace, you're paying for it, which is entirely fair. However, I believe that at its core, Bitcoin should be lean—primarily storing essential financial transactions without cluttering the chain with non-monetary information. Let the free market rule.
reply
189 sats \ 0 replies \ @BitcoinErrorLog fwd 4h
If you want Bitcoin to work differently you need to provide a design solution that prevents this behavior. Filters and OP_RETURN limits do not prevent this use case.
reply