Hey @DarthCoin, sorry, we realized that with me starting the topic and @tidwell asking the questions, he’d have pay 10× for each post, 1 sats, 10 sats, 100 sats, 1000 sats, and we decided to switch roles for the opening post when he saw the 10,000 sats ^^. We will post another topic in a minute.
Is because you are posting the questions too fast. Is an anti-spam feature of SN. Is like an OP_RETURN limit of SN 😂😂😂 Good initiative to do this on SN btw!
If OP_RETURN still cannot stop all the garbage, why is so important to remove it? Does it affect future development / improvements for LN ?
What will be the worst case scenario if users still could set their own limits for OP_RETURN?
Hey @DarthCoin, sorry, we realized that with me starting the topic and @tidwell asking the questions, he’d have pay 10× for each post, 1 sats, 10 sats, 100 sats, 1000 sats, and we decided to switch roles for the opening post when he saw the 10,000 sats ^^. We will post another topic in a minute.
Is because you are posting the questions too fast. Is an anti-spam feature of SN.
Is like an OP_RETURN limit of SN 😂😂😂
Good initiative to do this on SN btw!
Thanks! Our new topic is here: #971277
How would someone get around the standardness policy currently for OP_RETURN size?
What does "standardness mean" in reference to OP_RETURNs?
Will more than 1 OP_RETURN per transaction be possible if this PR gets merged?
deleted by author
What are the current OP_RETURN limits and what restrictions are being lifted?
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author