pull down to refresh
154 sats \ 3 replies \ @Filiprogrammer 11h \ on: Summation of retiring the 80-Byte OP_RETURN Limit by instagibbs bitcoin
perhaps
Sorry to sound like an ass, but deciding whether a proposed code change is the right path forward is not a public vote—it’s a technical discussion. You have to make arguments that convince the project contributors to influence the outcome.
As far as I can tell, there is a lot of culturally motivated opposition and some poorly substantiated doom-saying, but I have yet to see a technically convincing argument against this change.
reply
I can understand the argument that this change might reduce the pollution of the UTXO set in favor of OP_RETURN, but completely removing the option for the user to easily configure these mempool policies seems a bit extreme.