pull down to refresh

Strike Lending explained by Jack Mallers I wish this product had come sooner from Strike Lending with lower minimums. A personal experience:

Scenario:

I recently had 2 large unexpected expenses hit at the same time. Whats worse, the price of BTC dipped at exactly the same time. I don't keep idle fiat lying around for this. I have income, but I need dollars to cover my needs.

Options:

My traditional finance choices to borrow money were: some sort of personal loan, to delay credit card payments past the due date , or default on a necessary obligation. But with a credit check, origination fees, time delays and other frictions, it would have been too late anyway. Not to mention what lender wants to lend to someone with no liquidity and countless bank transfers to places like 'River' and 'Strike'?... Doesn't sound like a loan officer's ideal client.
Delaying credit card payments at who-the-hell-knows-what-ungodly-% AND taking a hit on my credit score? No way.
So, I had to sell some sats when the BTC price was down to $80k.

A better way?

Enter Strike Lending (if only it were sooner). There are many trade-offs to consider. Maybe I'm just a fan boy, but I'm already sold on it.
Rather than tapping into emergency sats to pay my obligations, I could have deposited sats on Strike and borrowed the cash I needed. My bank is already linked. Immediately I can withdraw USD, pay my obligations off in full, and work toward paying off my Strike loan. No selling required.
The terms of the loan are: 1 Year loan, 12% APR, 50% LTV, no origination fee, no early prepayment fee, no credit check, ready immediately.

Objections & Retort:

It's too many sats to keep on an exchange. I have to trust Strike not to run off with my sats. I lose access to the sats on Strike for the duration of the loan. 12% APR is stiff.
However, I could pay it off early. Let's say I pay it back in 2-3 months, my interest expense is cut down significantly. And the best part? I'd keep my sats which have rallied ~20%. As soon as the loan is repaid, I'd get my sats the hell off the exchange ASAP.

End the Story:

I'd be willing to accept these tradeoffs because - I did not want to sell sats at a bad time. But sometimes, life happens, and that's OK. That 12% loan is looking pretty damn tasty in hindsight. I'm glad we are getting tools and products to utilize if needed.
The whole post is bullshit crap fiat maximalism. Lending against your sats is the most stupid thing ever. You are literally SUPPORTING your own fiat debt slavery and will never get the fuck out from fiat. People always forget why the fuck we are in Bitcoin: to destroy fiat !
FFS wake up people !
reply
10 sats \ 6 replies \ @Catcher 22h
Imagine this scenario - you have stacked 0,5 BTC, then life happens and let's say you need 25000 USD to pay for whatever shit happened in your life. At the same time there is a black swan event in the market (as all the shit happens at the same time) and BTC dips to 50k.
Your solution is to say - "that's what the savings are for" - and say goodbye to half of your stack?
reply
you need 25000 USD to pay for whatever shit
that's the catch: you do NOT need USD if you use bitcoin as money. For more you still support the use of USD for more you will "need" it...
reply
Unfortunately, this isn't how it works for most people right now. I doubt there are even 100 people on the planet who can truly live without any exposure to fiat currency. Even for those fully committed to a Bitcoin standard, fiat still dominates as the unit of account. For example, if you need to fix your roof—even if the roofer accepts BTC—they'll likely still quote the price based on the BTC-to-fiat exchange rate. So if Bitcoin happens to be down at that moment, it could significantly impact your savings
reply
reply
Funny, but just proves my point)
12% is definitely more attractive than what the market is offering right now, but the 50% LTV still gives off strong 2008 GFC vibes—back when people were encouraged to borrow against their homes because the housing market was seen as a “number-go-up” technology. In a major market crash, banks could end up seizing a large portion of the BTC used as collateral.
Now imagine you're a player like Saylor or Mallers, sitting on a massive BTC treasury. You’ve issued loans, and you know that a 50% drop in BTC price will trigger mass liquidations. If you also happen to know when and how to push the price down, you could short BTC, dump your holdings to crash the market, profit from the short, and then scoop up all the liquidated BTC with your earnings.
You’d end up owning even more BTC—at half the price. Probably illegal, though. Could all be absolutely not how it works, correct me if I'm wrong;)
reply