pull down to refresh

Debt remains a powerful lever for operational scale, yet careful attention must be paid to the underlying terms and risk parameters—a focus that will be further developed in the second installment of this series. The experience of the 2022 deleveraging cycle underscores the importance of prudent leverage strategies, particularly in volatile, asset-dependent industries like Bitcoin mining.
Since that period, ASIC-backed loans have largely receded, giving way to Bitcoin-backed lending, which offers greater flexibility and price transparency for borrowers, especially in a rising market environment where Bitcoin serves as a liquid and appreciating collateral. Meanwhile, hashrate-backed financing—which involves pledging future mining output as security—continues to exist as a niche product, though often at a premium cost compared to more conventional collateral structures. These developments signal a broader evolution in mining finance, as firms increasingly seek to align capital structures with risk-adjusted return profiles and market cycles.
this territory is moderated
More and more I'm wondering about the parties in the btc ecosystem that are
a) incredibly rich in btc terms, and b) astoundingly encumbered by debt
The most notable examples are btc shell (nee "treasury") companies (e.g., MSTR and these other nascent "big pile of bitcoins" instruments) but seems like miners meet that description too.
I'm trying to think through what the collapse of this giant tower of debt could look like, perhaps something like:
  • btc price craters due to exogenous shock of some kind
  • the growth stalls out, premia over NAV erodes
  • debt must be serviced
  • company forced to sell largeish number of btc
  • price plummets further
  • people start panic-selling
  • lather, rinse, repeat
I'd like to understand in more detail how this might go, but to do that I'd have to understand more about these debt dynamics. Seems like somebody could produce their life's work on a really solid analysis of this topic.
reply
It seems inevitable to me too, but my debt worldview is anchored in the 2008 financial crisis and I see debt bubbles everywhere. There's such a strong macro/inflation tail wind now that the exogenous shock would have to be huge I imagine - like government confiscation, coinbase failing, our exploitable consensus being exploited, quantum, or some ASI creating inventing a 10000x better bitcoin. Something so big that Saylor and company feel comfortable dismissing them as "yeah, we can't stop catastrophic shit from happening."
reply