pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @028559d218 26 May \ parent \ on: Darknet Market Maximalism bitcoin
What's really sad... is the good, well-intentioned people who HODLed monero for the last 8 years, and since 2017 Monero is the same price.
With less purchasing power due to inflation over the last 8 years. THAT is the sad story that makes XMR people upset. That Monero has nowhere near the adoption and liquidity of Bitcoin... obviously makes some XMR people upset/jealous/confused... hence the "no-adoption" non-sequitur that someone we can't and shouldn't expect "wide adoption" because it "doesn't work that way."
OK sure.
So basically... "my crypto" is so great... but it will never have global adoption? What?
I mean... all this stuff is already happening right? Have you seen the bond market this year???
Stranger things have happened.
I mean NOT LIKE THAT no... of course not. But I mean stranger things have happened.
As we have already seen, every aspect of peer-to-peer digital cash that makes it an assault on the strength of the nation-state has been attacked, neutered, and infiltrated. Fiat currency is not going to go away quietly, and the general public goes along and will continue to go along with what the government tells them to do because it is safe, and people like to feel safe.
???
The moonboy mob goes along with the circus because the number continues to go upwards, and all the while the media implies that the usecase of a medium of exchange is a relic of the clumsy cypherpunk origins. Any hint of the counter culture that is an affront to banking is downplayed and smeared as crimes against anti-money-laundering legislation. In a word, their idealized future of peer-to-peer cash is an alternate form of Venmo—censorable, controllable, compliant.
So when Bitcoin's use is "not compliant" then it's "on its way out"... but when XMR's use is non-compliant... it's getting stronger???
I would continue writing but... I am running out of space and Cowboy Credits. And i think you understand the points I have made and I could go on...
reply