Shaking my head over here. Even just 1% would be such a no-brainer.
pull down to refresh
0 new comment
195 sats \ 2 replies \ @SimpleStacker 1 Jun
From my personal experience, the people who have participated and gained the most from the traditional financial sector are the most opposed to Bitcoin. This would include most Meta shareholders, I think.
I think they oppose Bitcoin because they don't see a need. The current system has worked for them, so why would they support something that purports to upend the current system?
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @sancristrader 1 Jun
not only that: but they also see bitcoin as a threat to the working (for them) traditional fiat system
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford OP 1 Jun
Yeah, that's my sense as well.
reply
0 new comment
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 1 Jun
Bad example. The smell of bullshit got stronger when I heard that.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Crow 1 Jun freebie
Fine by me if they want to stick with the fiat world. Gives me longer to stack sats!
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @hybridbits 1 Jun
That's good news. More Bitcoin to the people, and less to zionists.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @fiatbad 1 Jun
Not if the "people" (retail) keep selling around this 100k price.
Not if the "people" don't start using Bitcoin for more than just SoV.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @hybridbits 2 Jun
It's natural to use Bitcoin as a store of value. Sound money is SoV.
Also, in prisons, the cheapest cigarettes are used first. Fiat colorful little papers will be used as money as long there is enough clueless people acepting it.
reply
0 new comment