I mainly use Phoenix (non custodial) and some times Wallet of Satoshi (Custodial).
Apparently, Muun isn't a LN wallet, but it uses on chain transactions.
muun is absolutely LN enabled. It seamlessly combines on-chain and LN payments so the end user doesn't have to really think about it. Would consider reading up a bit more --> https://muun.com/
reply
Not really.
reply
oof, if you're 'proof' is coming from r/btc you might want to reconsider... turbo channels are well documented and optional. All lightning channels require an on-chain transaction to establish the channel...
reply
Of course, but once opened it can be reused many times, it doesn't need to be closed immediately and open a new one for the next LN transaction.
reply
While it is lightning enabled, it uses some pretty bad practices to abstract the 'choice' of onchain vs lightning. I'm not sure if in this context 'the user doesn't have to really think about it' is a good thing. I'm still a muun user and think it's a good wallet, but it's not a wallet that gives you a lot of control. You should absolutely know what the tradeoffs are
reply