pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @LibertasBR 6 Jun \ parent \ on: No, Your 'Doggo' Doesn't Have Rights | The Libertarian Institute Animal_World
Thinking about animal welfare, the best for now will be to consider them property, knowing that this is an easy stance without much criticism and with more benefits for us than for their actual “well-being.
write
preview
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 6 Jun
When do you start thinking of them as something other than property? What would they be then?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @LibertasBR 6 Jun
Free and thinking beings — that’s the core of your post, and it’s exactly what I neither want to define nor am able to define.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 6 Jun
The article tried to define what thinking beings are. I think it did a fairly good four point decision tree.
reply