pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 6 Jun \ parent \ on: No, Your 'Doggo' Doesn't Have Rights | The Libertarian Institute Animal_World
When do you start thinking of them as something other than property? What would they be then?
Free and thinking beings — that’s the core of your post, and it’s exactly what I neither want to define nor am able to define.
reply
The article tried to define what thinking beings are. I think it did a fairly good four point decision tree.
reply