pull down to refresh

20 sats \ 7 replies \ @grayruby 13h
Is lightning better for privacy than mixers?
reply
that's the question @supertestnet is trying to respond too
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 12h
Yes, I have seen him talk about this before which planted the seed in my brain from his previous posts about it.
reply
30 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 12h
I am not sure if it makes sense to have a lightning channel open with 300BTC inbound liquidity if you’re not a massive routing node and just want to receive payments
reply
Good point. I was just curious.
reply
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 12h
So I guess my answer to your question is that it depends on the amount
reply
Fair enough.
reply
That’s crazy!! So much for privacy.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 3h
Did he send it to an exchange? I was looking at the TX and found one linked to it that had a whole bunch on 101BTC consolidations.
reply
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 14h
Make sense: a settlement for an "old administrative dispute" on Silk Road 😂😂 Like a "gentlemen agreement".
reply
🤣 CIA paying the bill under AB cover?
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Riberet 6h
At least he has recovered a small part of his Bitcoins with that donation.
reply
Is Ross actually going to be able to spend that?
reply
110 sats \ 0 replies \ @flat24 11h
I take off my hat 🤠 before that individual. "Maybe he made a lot of money and told himself that if one day they release Ross, he would send his share of the commission" 🤷
reply