10 sats \ 0 replies \ @javier 11h \ parent \ on: Civil and Lawful Rebellion: Do you know the difference ? AskSN
Nooooo don't compare me with that statist....
Well, it is surprising to me how ignorant people are about Natural Law in this forum, considering it is a Bitcoin forum. Is people really understanding why Bitcoin exist? It is just about regaining economic sovereignty.
It's quite simple:
- Civil rebellion: made by citizens, which means made by subjects, which are slaves of the State Corporation. Their intention is just to change "legal" law or constitution (statutes) so they can feel more comfort in their jail. It is an ignorant rebellion, as they don't know they are under contract, and by rebelling they only aspire to slightly change their way of life. But everything will continue more or less the same after the rebellion.
- Lawful rebellion: made by Sovereign Beings, not subject to any Corporation. This is a wise rebellion, as the intention is to become free from oppression of the State Corporation, or any other Corporation which is trying to scam or coerce them.
Which brings us to two different aspects of a similar term:
- Legal: under contract.
- Lawful: under Natural Moral Law.
Something lawful can also be legal, if the contract is voluntary. Something legal may not be lawful, if it is imposed without previous well informed consent.
There you have.
It's related to government. This happens mostly in countries in which the child grows and goes from parenting to gov-parenting. Govs use this to maintain happy slaves in their portfolios, and the method is as this: they use the grown ups to extract their rent and spare it over the less grown ups. In the end, maturity average is less and less, up to a point in which a big reset must happen, or otherwise mega destruction would inevitably happen.
This cycle is best understood with this meme:
What an idiot.
So all Rusian people are bad, apparently.
Using the same logic, we could say all finlands are drunk idiots, or all americans are woke retarded.
The urge to finish all threads with the same pathetic answer again and again, so that the others may perceive you've win because you are the last one, is called inferiority complex.
Not a surprise, all statist are statists because they can't deal with the responsibility, which is a common symptom for the inferiority complex.
javier = Darthcoin = Circle jerk Idiocracy
Nope, we are not the same person.
But you are the idiot, the one who cannot meme, nor understand a meme.
The only problem is that in any ecash system, fractional reserve is possible.
So this would, effectively, create the same problem as with fiat: infinite creation of money that recirculates inside the bank until there is a bank run.
121 sats \ 7 replies \ @javier 24 Oct \ parent \ on: Biden's Absurd War in Yemen Continues Politics_And_Law
100 sats \ 9 replies \ @javier 23 Oct \ parent \ on: Biden's Absurd War in Yemen Continues Politics_And_Law
You see? You can't understand.
His memes are totally logical and have a deep meaning. You just discard them as childish because you don't get them.
100 sats \ 13 replies \ @javier 23 Oct \ parent \ on: Biden's Absurd War in Yemen Continues Politics_And_Law
Wrong again. He responded with a meme, which has a deep meaning. Another question is if you are able to interpret memes. @DarthCoin is not only able to interpret them, but even make them. And good ones, I must say. That makes him more intelligent than you.
There is a say: shitcoiners, leftists and statists have something in common: they are unable to understand memes. That makes them retarded. Regardless on how well they are trained on repeating stupid concepts.
There is nothing bad about that. It doesn't mean he is wrong. Specially considering how really dumb is the human world, specially the world of politics and states.
All the worst people in the world are very intellectual, because they are lost in their forever cognitive dissonance mental disorder.
On the contrary, you can be intellectual being a good person, but it is not required. Anyway, I've seen @DarthCoin to be very intellectual when he wants. I suspect he is not now with you because he is laughing at you very hard. Because you deserve it.
I rectify: the state is a group of gangsters. Not a good group, because you cannot choose to be in it or not, and, as you say, it is organized in a hierarchy of force.
The NAP and the natural moral law doesn't go against groups, only against groups that use coercion and violence. Under this, you can participate of any group that you like and you are accepted, which is very contrary to what states do: impose and destroy your choice, enslaving you.