pull down to refresh
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @javier 15 May \ on: Coinos is NOT A RUG PULL, withdrawals are re-enabled for ALL EXCEPT..... bitcoin
With all my due respect, you have Zeus and Blixt which are fully non-custodials. Custodial wallets are easier which makes them good for total noobs, but that's it, after 1 week they should advance. But you have been around for years, why don't you take a few minutes to learn Zeus instead of wasting your time writing shit posts like this?
I don't dislike it, I like it very much.
Unfortunately every noob I've showed it says it is like a space ship, they don't understand a fuck, haha. But it also happens with Bluewallet, Phoenix, etc, although Zeus and Blixt are probably the most complicated ones.
I don't see it as misinformation, but how (evil) govs work and how we can use their own laws against them.
I post here because it is for CBDC.
Wow thank you very much for helping CLN users!
Would you please post it in text format and I'll attach as another apendix?
Have you checked it works?
Thank you!
If UBI is introduced to some countries, then it will be the end of those countries, as UBI is pure communism.
If UBI is introduced to all countries, then it will be the end of the world.
If AI reduce some of the work in some sectors, then people will have to move to another sectors, change their specialization. If they don't do it, they should die. In nature, those not adapted perish. It's normal and it has to happen. If you fight against this universal law you will lose. You just can't fight against it, no matter how clever you think you are. You will be punished by nature by collapsing all the race.
And perhaps the few that survived can recreate the world again, but who knows.
Note: for rest setup please configure also TLS with a proper certificate, for security reasons.
Also, open port 22000 so autossh works best.
Thanks.
Inequality is natural and necessary, lets take several examples:
- Students in an school and university, do they all deserve the name score? Let's put a A+ to everyone, regardless of their intelligence and efforts, right?
- Beauty, why some people are ugly and other goodlooking? Lets make all of them ugly, so the less beautiful people don't feel bad.
- Health, why are some people more healthy than others? That's unjust, let's make everybody ill.
- Social success, why anybody has to be more popular than others? Let's punish the popular people.
As you can see, the search for equality is just envy. Why would it be different with financial success?
People looking for equality are just envy people. And it is very bad, and very unjust, to take their success out of their hands, the same way it would be unjust to desfigure the face of a beautiful women so less beautiful ones feel better, or create illness to the healthy, or put the same score to all students, or punish popularity.
Think about it.
Sorry, noob, but you don't understand LN fees. Have a look at my guide and you will understand how does it work: #972730
It is mostly based on scarcity which is a derivative of demand, not on onchain costs, and it is self regulated. The more people use LN, the more nodes will come. For a route, it always wins the one with the lower fee with enough liquidity. So it is a very competitive market.
Look at the statistics of my node for one day:
I have routed 43M in one day, earning only 69ppm wihch is roughly 0.0069%. This is a fraction of what credit cards issuers charge, which is between 0.5% and 5%. If there is going to be more demand, I could raise the fees, of course, but would never get to 0.5%. And if there is much more demand, I'm sure many new nodes will appear to compete against me.
This world is a world of imbeciles. Having the opportunity to own the real thing they buy the stupid fake thing that merely reflects, remotely, Bitcoin.
Apendix A: liquidity draining channels
It happened to many of us, specially at the begining of setting up a node, that we connect to liquidity draining nodes. These are nodes that suck all the liquidity you throw at them and never return it, or return it very vaguely, to then, in a few moments later, suck it again. These are channels usually related to services in which the managers do not take their time and efforts on rebalancing their channels because they are always getting new channels coming in, and don't feel any need to return the favor to the smaller nodes that are providing liquidity for free (or almost free). This is very unfortunate, and I think we should punish them.
Typical nodes in that situation in 2025 are Kraken, lnbig, bfx (bitfinex), ACINQ, coingate, etc.
Some contact of me, which has this problem, has found that he is unable to properly route because of this and sent me an screenshot of his channels. Take a look at the list:
You can see, the problem is that all the liquidity are in normal channels, while most of the draining nodes are sucking it and never return it. So all his inbound channels are draining nodes, and all his good nodes are just stuck because the don't have proper inbound pairs.
So, even if he may have a near 100% ratio (not the case now, but he may), he can't route because he has too many draining channels that never return liquidity.
To avoid this, it is better to just not connect to those known draining nodes, which is a form of punishment to them. Another solution is to configure charge-lnd so for those channels there is always high fees.
For example:
[known-one-way-drains]
node.id = 033d8656219478701227199cbd6f670335c8d408a92ae88b962c49d4dc0e83e025,
03cde60a6323f7122d5178255766e38114b4722ede08f7c9e0c5df9b912cc201d6,
021c97a90a411ff2b10dc2a8e32de2f29d2fa49d41bfbb52bd416e460db0747d0d,
03037dc08e9ac63b82581f79b662a4d0ceca8a8ca162b1af3551595b8f2d97b70a,
030c3f19d742ca294a55c00376b3b355c3c90d61c6b6b39554dbc7ac19b141c14f,
03d607f3e69fd032524a867b288216bfab263b6eaee4e07783799a6fe69bb84fac,
02a04446caa81636d60d63b066f2814cbd3a6b5c258e3172cbdded7a16e2cfff4c,
02f1a8c87607f415c8f22c00593002775941dea48869ce23096af27b0cfdcc0b69,
0242a4ae0c5bef18048fbecf995094b74bfb0f7391418d71ed394784373f41e4f3
strategy = static
fee_ppm = 3500
Just substitute the fee for whatever you consider necessary, and the node ids for those that you know they are going to drain you. The list in the example is not exahustive, you may add the many nodes that LNBig has, and many others. In my experience, WalletOfSatoshi is doing well, TempleOfSats also doing well, so this is not a problem of being a service that always drains not matter what, there are services that demonstrate they can properly manage a node without draining their peers like hell!
But if you already have this problem, your only solution is to go to Lightning Plus and do as many swaps as possible to get inbound liquidity, and, at the same time, use boltz.exchange and/or LOOP to try to get as much inbound as possible, until you get a ratio close to 100% not including those draining channels.
Apendix B: how to obtain a public ipv4 clearnet address on a residential connection
This is something that so many people has asked me over the years that I'm forced to do a mini guide here. There are many possible solutions, and if you do a search about it you will find many ways. One way that I know works perfectly is as follow:
- Step 1: rent a cheap VPS with a clearnet ipv4 address. You can find many for only $2 a month.
- Step 2: Configure access to ssh using keys, not requiring the introduction of a password to connect to it: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-configure-ssh-key-based-authentication-on-a-linux-server
- Step 3: Open ports in the VPS. If you have ufw, just execute
ufw allow 9735. If you want rest access, alsoufw allow 8080, or whatever port you use. - Step 4: install
autosshcli program on both your node and the VPS:apt install autossh. - Step 5: create a systemd service under
/etc/systemd/system/node-autossh.servicewith a similar content like this, please ensure you write a properExecPathline appropriate for your node, and yourUser:
[Unit]
Description=Autossh service
After=network-online.target
[Service]
User=javier
Type=simple
RestartSec=30
Environment=AUTOSSH_POLL=60
Restart=on-failure
ExecStart=/usr/bin/autossh -M 22000 -N -D 1080 -R MY_VPS_IP:9735:localhost:9735 root@MY_VPS_IP
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
Note: if you run lnd under docker, you will have to put your lnd container ip instead of localhost.
Now enable it by running
systemctl daemon-reload && systemctl enable node-autossh && systemctl start node-autossh.- Step 6: configure your
lnd.confadding this:
externalip=MY_VPS_IP:9735
tor.skip-proxy-for-clearnet-targets=true
And that should work. You can route as many ports as you want just adding another
-R option to autossh.Hope it helps!!
Neutrino had some serious bugs in the past that leaded to force closes when the feeurl was offline, but they solved the problems recently. So I don't think you will have a problem using neutrino.
About having the node in a VPS, I am not in favor of that. People in the datacenter can have access to it, and having bitcoin in it is very tempting. But I would use the VPS as a VPN host for your node in your home, and redirect the appropriate ports. Another solution is using autossh to that VPS.
As I said, losing is imposible because it is a discount. But if you don't believe me, let Lighting Labs tell you so:
Fee policy means outbound fee policy, yes.
Inbound policies are a thing available in LND only, I think, but there is a BLIP: https://github.com/lightning/blips/pull/18
Other implementations should enable this, but you know CLN, it is always the last one and usually it comes late. Another reason not to choose CLN added to the long list.
For setting inbound fees graphically I know of LNDg in their advanced settings tab, which is also a good rebalancer and has a good interface (only for desktop).