pull down to refresh
@megaptera
stacking since: #256599longest cowboy streak: 18
Then you can close your existing KYC-associated channel and the only real onchain footprint is john doe opened a lightning channel, spent the sats (to where we don't know), and closed the channel
The problem here is still that you accociated your whole lightning node with those kyc coins. So it is quite clear that all the other utxos related to this node belong to you. When you close the channels only your channel partner knows how much funds you got.
So on-chain you basically doxxed all the utxos related to your node to those who know your kyc coins. How big of a problem this is, is for you to decide.
Threema is quite good. One-time payment (even possible in bitcoin, https://shop.threema.ch/en)
No phone # needed as well.
16 sats \ 1 reply \ @megaptera 8 May \ parent \ on: Now Live on PPQ: Jamie Podcast Search AI bitcoin
Nice! Planing on any foreign languages?
3 sats \ 0 replies \ @megaptera 5 May \ parent \ on: LNDg P&L "Offchain Costs" question AskSN lightning
So the fees for failed HTLC counts toward the p&l? That sounds like a bug... :)
Yes, you doxxed your node to the exchange. To the other operator not in particular because he does not know that those are kyc coins. But the risk is higher, agree.
To be sure you probably have to recycle the node and coin join / swap your coins.