Let's look at the last sentence of Section 1 of EO 6102: The term "person" means any individual, partnership

hosted a number of discussions about the historical precedent of the US Govt seizing gold via order 6102 ... For I am here to tell you of the many reasons we shall not see a repeat of EO 6102, and where freedom-minded

Bitcoin ETFs are quickly becoming the modern-day equivalent of Executive Order 6102 from U.S. history

In a comment about how things might shake out in response to a modern-day btc 6102, @k00b proposed that

In my opinion they have only just started, and of course the worst is yet to come, including a 6102 for ... En mi opinión solamente acaban de empezar, y por supuesto que lo peor está por llegar, incluyendo un 6102

I do not think there will be a 6102 or whatever, but I do think that they will try their best to limit

of the excellent longform writing that has recently appeared on SN (some nice examples on gold and 6102

A bitcoin 6102? As adoption increases, percentage of bitcoiners running nodes decreasing?

article from the Tenth Amendment Center: https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2024/05/16/executive-order-6102

The input amounts have special meaning: 6102 is a reference to Executive Order 6102, 1913 is the year

Emergency Banking Act - authorized President to prohibit international gold payments Executive Order 6102 ... know the details of the confiscation, which came about because of later legislation (Executive Order 6102

utxos: an in-flight HTLC and a force closure tx the input amounts contain several interesting numbers: 6102

When FDR issues the infamous EO 6102, he added insult to injury by increasing the value of gold and decreasing

Executive Order 6102 was signed on April 5th, 1933 by President Roosevelt in the United States. ... gold+hoarding&article_id=3194,738980&hl=en&sa=X#v=onepage&q=gold%20hoarding But after executive order 6102

India has tried to regulate gold while the US (with executive order 6102) even actively confiscated it