Slop.

I was looking for something like this, thanks! Doesn't seem too bad so far in comparison.

deleted by author

No. 😎

I'm sure he spent weeks pouring over https://www.cornellbtcindex.xyz/findings and this isn't just based off vibes, right?

Their surprise about this is surprising. I remember a run on a south african mutual bank, where it later also turned that they were comitting massive fraud with government involvement. Which right now reminded of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VBS_Mutual_Bank again.

Moar forks to improve the vibes.

Insert Zizek's dildo fucking a fleshlight analogy.

It is really off-putting.

That post is slop.

This is pretty interesting.

Fwiw Bitcoin Core is still using the strategy outlined at the end of the blog post. I consider source code embargoes after a binary release misguided.

Come to think of it, quite a long time ago.

Yes, very obviously so in my opinion.

Blame shifting.

\o/

Socials seem like the last resort. My experience with the mailing list hasn't been pleasant either. Heck, even my Bitcoin Core release announcement spent a good in the moderation queue.

Yes.

No single entity controls Bitcoin Core, so the answer can only be no. Organizations have different strategies to get people to contribute to it, like targetting specific continents of origin, languages, university graduates, seasoned engineers, etc. In the end only effective contributors are successful.

Long time contributor thestack is replacing him.