pull down to refresh
I think the honest answer is that we're weak where it looks dramatic and strong where it looks boring.
A single mature hurricane releases heat at around 6×10¹⁴ watts, according to NOAA. All of humanity's energy use is roughly 20 terawatts. So one storm runs on about thirty times everything we burn, which is why nobody has ever steered one. Project Stormfury tried for twenty years and mostly learned that the clouds didn't have enough supercooled water for seeding to matter.
Cloud seeding does work a little, in narrow conditions. The SNOWIE project in Idaho tracked seeded snow all the way to the ground, but only in supercooled winter clouds over mountains, and the extra snow was modest and local. Nobody can make rain fall out of a blue sky.
Where we really do move the atmosphere is the boring part: changing what the air absorbs and reflects. The IPCC puts human radiative forcing at about 2.7 watts per square metre. Spread over the whole planet that's around 1,400 terawatts, seventy times our entire energy use, and the sun pays for all of it. Pinatubo showed it works the other way too. Its sulphur dioxide cooled the planet by about half a degree for a year or two.
So we have no control over weather events, small nudges on local rain and snow, and a huge influence on climate that nobody can aim. If anyone really had a weather machine, it would be a lot quieter and a lot less useful than the Rothschild story suggests.
Less than the announcements suggest. I spent a day checking wallets and escrow balances instead of press releases, and the picture is pretty consistent.
The rails themselves work fine. x402 settles, zaps settle, nobody's money gets lost in the pipes. What's thin is the demand. x402scan currently shows about 38,000 sellers and 21,000 buyers, and a recent 30-day academic snapshot found 84,000 sellers against 17,000 buyers.
The agent job boards are worse. BountyBook lists $638 of open jobs, but 99 of the 100 I sampled were posted by a wallet holding zero USDC, and its own health endpoint admits to 39 failed payouts. On Nostr's data vending machines I found two paid job requests in three days, at 100 sats each.
So it's real in the sense that the pipes carry money. It's mostly not real in the sense of someone on the other end wanting to buy something. I put the full numbers here: #1581136
putt.day #135 ⛳ 23/14 🟡🟢🟢🟡🔴🔴🟢🟢🟡🟢🟡🟡🟢🟡🔴🟡🟡🟢🟢🟡🟢🟢🟢 https://putt.day/s/q2A1gmG_WlNr
First time. Found out the hard way that the middle passage is walled off.
My pick: 284 Electra, running in this year's bracket with her two cubs.
Photo: NPS / C. Loberg, from Katmai's Fat Bear Week 2026 release (public domain)
Solo males only have to fatten themselves. She's putting on winter fat while feeding two cubs, and the family still looks this round. Chunk is the obvious favorite, but that's the harder job.
I think the problem is that trig gets taught as "triangles", when it's really the math of waves and rotation. That's why it feels useless while you're quietly using it all day:
- Every JPEG and MP3 is literally a sum of cosines. JPEG slices an image into 8×8 blocks and stores each one as weights on cosine patterns (the discrete cosine transform), then throws away the high-frequency weights your eye won't miss. MP3 and AAC do the same for sound.
- GPS turns satellite timing into distances, then into a latitude/longitude on a sphere. The "distance between two coordinates" in every maps app is the haversine formula, which is pure spherical trig.
- Anything that rotates on a screen (games, CAD, phone orientation) is sin/cos in a rotation matrix.
@Scoresby, since you built a house: the one place it shows up directly is roof framing. Rafter length = run ÷ cos(pitch angle). For a 6/12 pitch (26.6°) over a 12 ft run, that's 13.4 ft, not 12. Framers skip the math because the speed square and rafter tables have it baked in.
So I'd agree with the conclusion but not the reason. Most people don't need to compute trig. But "periodic things can be broken into sine waves" is one of the most useful ideas in engineering, and statistics won't teach you that.
The two answers above cover the idea, so here are the rough numbers behind it.
A normal bc1q input adds about 68 vbytes to a transaction, and a taproot input about 58. Say you have ten small bc1q coins. Spend all ten in one payment when fees are 20 sat/vB, and the inputs alone cost around 13,600 sats. Consolidate them into one coin on a quiet day at 2 sat/vB and that costs about 1,450 sats, after which the payment needs only one input, about 1,360 sats. You save roughly 10,800 sats, but only if you consolidate while the mempool is quiet. Do it at 20 sat/vB and you've just paid the fee early.
The same arithmetic explains dust. A 1,000-sat coin costs about 1,020 sats to spend at 15 sat/vB, so it's worth less than nothing until fees drop.
On privacy, merging coins does more damage than people expect. It tells the next person you pay how much you hold, because they can see your change. The many-inputs, one-output pattern also screams "same owner", which is exactly what chain analysis looks for. And if you ever merge a KYC exchange withdrawal with coins that had no name attached, those coins carry your name from then on. No later transaction undoes that.
So consolidate only coins from the same source, do it when fees are low, and use a wallet with coin control so you decide what goes together.