pull down to refresh
@025738dda8
stacking since: #286545longest cowboy streak: 8
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @025738dda8 15h \ parent \ on: carbon credit and bitcoin lightning lightning
checked and regulated capitalism ~ central banking (that's in strong relation)
We want unchecked and unregulated capitalism, because the checks and regulations are evil and bring the world into the real ill condition.
I doubt you are on the list in this case unless asking for explicit support. And in that case, please correct me, only your email is on the list.
It is influenced a lot if I am alone, or with interesting people, or with boring people. If there is something, usually people, that enriches me or if I am in a calm place, I do not need to use any digital things.
But it feels like it is more and more difficult to talk to/meet such people or being at such calm places. Anyway, communication with humans wins against the digital crap, at least for me.
Where does the gov cashflow come from? What does it mean near zero? It looks like some kind of perpetuum mobile...
To calculate the geographic profile of crypto flows, the entity-to-entity data are complemented by the geographic distribution of app usage of the respective exchange or the web traffic of a crypto exchange’s website. For example, if 56% of usage of the app of a specific exchange originates from the US, 56% of all crypto in- and outflows to this exchange are allocated to the US. By aggregating over all crypto exchanges, bilateral cross-country data are obtained. ... Figure A.2 in the Annex provides graphical evidence to affirm the accuracy of the approximated flows. Clearly, the pseudo-anonymity of the ledgers implies that a comprehensive attribution of transactions to users is impossible, such that a mapping of flows to countries will always remain an approximation. Even so, our measure of cross-border flows is tightly linked to the number of crypto exchange users at the country-level
Page 6+. There is more text explaining this.
Nobody knows which coins exactly are owned by Satoshi and which are owned by somebody else. So what soft/hard fork could we talk about...
If it is truely possible to live just from Prana and never eat and drink anything. Even if I know personally someone like that, it is not possible to prove that unless you spend every single second with that person. And even in that case, you cannot prove to 3rd parties.
What if there is a node/miner/watchtower in space somewhere in the middle between the Earth and Mars? The time to get to this middle point would be half from both planets. There can be more such floating nodes on 1/4, 3/4 of the distance to increase decentralization, reliability and probably even trust.
(Just thinking loudly.)
Right, or you may not want to and instead use your mobile phone. Well, I don't care, that's not my way. I just see a use case.
What if somebody does not use a laptop and instead only have a mobile device? This becomes more and more possible and practical when traveling a lot.
Useless crap. Nobody has any incentive to use this. BTC is not a storage platform. Full decentralization of everything does not make any sense.
If being short bitcoin by holding more fiat than necessary is so much stupid, it is difficult to estimate what gigant stupidity is behind burning sats.
I hope for you to get so high on-chain fees that such crap dies quickly and never appears again.
When using libsodium-based cryptography, it does the magic under the hood:
The nonce is derived from the sha512 of hashed private key and the message being signed. Optionally, if enabled during compilation, the nonce can be randomized via func _crypto_sign_ed25519_synthetic_r_hv().
Unfortunately, still missing a tool for making presentations and some kind of calc. And the current docs are still early.