Notre Dame - 52 Penn State - 54 Texas - 52 Tennessee - 47

Sounds fun, count me in. Also looking forward to following along here during the games to see how quickly odds of this prediction market update with momentum swings. https://beta.predyx.com/market/college-football-champion-2025

Looks like the teams are the correct color now. Though, it is weird that there is a blue “other” in the legend that shows it sums up to 0.1 on the y axis, but the ‘other’ trace doesn’t actually appear in the plot. Also, the total would be more than 0.1 for all the remaining teams not currently shown in the plot.

Nice, I see the market is up. I’m not sure the plot colors are right. Oregon is showing as green, but it looks like it is actually the purple trace. Seems like Texas should be green.

Awesome, looking forward to it. Yup, those are the 12 teams!

This was December 8th, not January 8th

Any update on this? It would be awesome to see a multi-option market for the 12 team college football playoff.

The bracket is here: https://www.espn.com/college-football/playoff-bracket

Georgia does not play Texas A&M today, they play Texas. Different team.

Awesome, thanks. Would recommend sharing that somewhere in the FAQ. Gives me way more confidence to start trading having that information.

How does predix take their cut? Fees off each trade? Off of the spread? Didn’t see that in the FAQ. Just curious what piece of the pie that is. Thanks.

Anyone have a suggested Pubky to enter as an example to see what public data it reveals?

Nobody. Unlike previous bull runs, friends and family haven’t started asking about it again yet this cycle.

How would it be possible to “mine all remaining bitcoin in the USA”? What could possibly be done to prevent any person or entity outside of the USA from mining a single block? It’s just a clear misunderstanding of how bitcoin mining works, and nothing will make that statement achievable. I guess maybe a credible threat of nuclear attack against any location detected to be mining bitcoin outside of the US. Even then, that would not be ‘good for Bitcoin’.

Can we give 9 a grade of F already? Notes: “that’s not how this works”

Will do. That was my main hold up. I'm going to consolidate my different histories in one place for easy searching (work phone, personal phone, different laptop browsers, ChatGPT subscription export, etc.) That will have me using ppq.ai far more frequently, and I'll drop the subscription which was serving that purpose for me (the ability to continue conversations later). Once I'm using ppq.ai more often, I'll be happy to send over any additional feedback.

This is fantastic! Thanks for circling back!

Yea, ente and immich are the two I played around with the most today. Settled on giving ente a try with this friend group. The browser link functionality for both was similar, but, I figure there is a greater chance of these friends making a free ente account, in which case the app has significantly more album collaboration features. The same is true with immich, but much less likely these friends will create their own immich instances. Alternative would be having them create accounts on my VPS, but, ente seemed more beginner friendly in that regard.

No, I plan to pay for the storage. I was going to pay for the VPS anyway (which also would have meant paying for the storage). Friends can have a free account (5 GB storage free), and still have full access to the shared album I am hosting (via paid storage) it appears.

The plan isn't to just have a ente.io account that keeps growing, it would be to collect all photos from a few trips, take them offline to personal storage (and friends can save what they want) then delete it. But some paid storage will be needed in the interim.

Update: https://github.com/ente-io/ente is looking like a really promising option. Fully open source, end to end encrypted. Skip the VPS step and just pay for the storage you need, with lots of tiers to choose from. Pretty much ticks all the boxes above

Thanks, I’ll definitely look into this for my own use, but, I’d still be skeptical about sending out a link to a shared folder with upload capability, and having it be passwordless to friends of friends. Adding a password already adds a barrier to some, adding a weak password isn’t much better. I don’t have to want to keep track of what security vulnerabilities are out there which might allow for exploits to gain access beyond the group folder. I kind of like the idea of keeping my personal storage separate from links I send out to a wider audience for group photos. Even if the fears are unfounded, the value of peace of mind is real.

Yea, I'll definitely play around with it. Seems like more of an improvement to other areas of my file management, with a side benefit of if I set up a reverse proxy, I could securely use it for the purposes of this post. Perhaps a few extra steps, but combined with other benefits, may be worth it. Appreciate it.

I agree that my personal photos should stay with me, but when it comes to collecting photos from other family/friends, most of which already have their photos in google photos, collecting them on a cloud server before moving them to more private storage is not a big concern to me. I'd rather that than worry about the security of connecting some friends of friends on a group trip into my own home network with a passwordless link, which I would still need to do with a home NAS.